Short-term prognosis analysis of critically ill patients entering the emergency department by different ways based on propensity score matching

The aim was to explore the short-term prognosis of critically ill patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) by 2 different means of transportation (ambulance and nonambulance), aiming to identify critically ill patients and ensure patient safety. Critically ill patients admitted to the ED from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were included and divided into 2 groups: those with ambulance transportation and those with nonambulance transportation. The 2 groups were matched via the propensity score matching method, and the short-term prognoses of the 2 groups when the patients left the ED were compared. A total of 1150 patients were enrolled, including 713 (62.0%) male and 437 (38.0%) female patients with a median age of 70 (58, 83) years. Patients aged 70 years and older who were transported by ambulance had longer stays (P = .023), experienced a greater number of resuscitations within 24 hours (P = .007) and were more likely to experience in-hospital death or intensive care unit admission (P = .007) than those with nonambulance transportation. Compared with patients with nonambulance transportation, patients with ambulance transportation who were admitted to the ED or who died within 24 hours after discharge from the hospital had more rescue visits and longer stays in the emergency room, and a greater number of these patients were transferred to the ward unit or the hospital. More attention should be given to the management of patients with ambulance transportation to reduce the risk of adverse nursing outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045502
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-term prognosis analysis of critically ill patients entering the emergency department by different ways based on propensity score matching

Na Liu, Dandan Zhu, Yanhua Ma, Ji Xia et al.
Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Short-term prognosis analysis of critically ill patients entering the emergency department by different ways based on propensity score matching

Na Liu, Dandan Zhu, Yanhua Ma, Ji Xia, Ya‐Mei Guan, Ying An
article en

Abstract

The aim was to explore the short-term prognosis of critically ill patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) by 2 different means of transportation (ambulance and nonambulance), aiming to identify critically ill patients and ensure patient safety. Critically ill patients admitted to the ED from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were included and divided into 2 groups: those with ambulance transportation and those with nonambulance transportation. The 2 groups were matched via the propensity score matching method, and the short-term prognoses of the 2 groups when the patients left the ED were compared. A total of 1150 patients were enrolled, including 713 (62.0%) male and 437 (38.0%) female patients with a median age of 70 (58, 83) years. Patients aged 70 years and older who were transported by ambulance had longer stays (P = .023), experienced a greater number of resuscitations within 24 hours (P = .007) and were more likely to experience in-hospital death or intensive care unit admission (P = .007) than those with nonambulance transportation. Compared with patients with nonambulance transportation, patients with ambulance transportation who were admitted to the ED or who died within 24 hours after discharge from the hospital had more rescue visits and longer stays in the emergency room, and a greater number of these patients were transferred to the ward unit or the hospital. More attention should be given to the management of patients with ambulance transportation to reduce the risk of adverse nursing outcomes.

MedicineVol. 104(48)
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), Capital Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.