China’s Macroeconomic Development: The Role of Gradualist Reforms

This paper provides analytic guides to recent literature on China’s macroeconomic development, emphasizing the critical role of the gradualist reform approach. Our analysis suggests that from 1978 to 1997, the gradualist approach contributed to China’s aggregate total factor productivity and economic growth primarily through policies that facilitated the reallocation of surplus labor from agriculture to nonagricultural sectors. Since 1998, the government’s focus shifted, with various reforms encouraging large enterprises, whether state owned or privately owned, to enter capital-intensive sectors, making capital deepening the main driver of economic growth. While this strategy sustained China’s GDP growth, it also increased trade tensions with global partners, created barriers to transitioning to a consumption-led economy, and threatened China’s long-term financial stability, casting long shadows over the Chinese economy. (JEL E23, F14, L16, O11, O47, P21, P24)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Literature
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20251631
Citations
2
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Macroeconomic Development: The Role of Gradualist Reforms

Kaiji Chen, Tao Zha
2 citations
Journal of Economic Literature
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
17.04
article

China’s Macroeconomic Development: The Role of Gradualist Reforms

Kaiji Chen, Tao Zha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper provides analytic guides to recent literature on China’s macroeconomic development, emphasizing the critical role of the gradualist reform approach. Our analysis suggests that from 1978 to 1997, the gradualist approach contributed to China’s aggregate total factor productivity and economic growth primarily through policies that facilitated the reallocation of surplus labor from agriculture to nonagricultural sectors. Since 1998, the government’s focus shifted, with various reforms encouraging large enterprises, whether state owned or privately owned, to enter capital-intensive sectors, making capital deepening the main driver of economic growth. While this strategy sustained China’s GDP growth, it also increased trade tensions with global partners, created barriers to transitioning to a consumption-led economy, and threatened China’s long-term financial stability, casting long shadows over the Chinese economy. (JEL E23, F14, L16, O11, O47, P21, P24)

Journal of Economic LiteratureVol. 63(4)
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (US), National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Macroeconomic Development: The Role of Gradualist Reforms — Kaiji Chen, Tao Zha · Journal of Economic Literature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS