Collapse Risk of Tall Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings

Existing buildings, particularly those predating modern building codes, pose significant seismic risk in regions of high seismicity worldwide. In the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, reinforced concrete shear wall (RCSW) buildings are prevalent in the construction of tall buildings. Many of these buildings were constructed before the introduction of ductility requirements in the Canadian concrete standard during the mid-1980s, and they predominantly serve as residences for renters, seniors, and low-income populations. This study quantifies the collapse risk of these tall nonductile RCSW buildings to understand their seismic vulnerability. Leveraging a comprehensive database of pre-1980 RCSW buildings, a framework is proposed to generate representative archetypes using a random forest regression model. An automated workflow is developed to facilitate nonlinear structural analyses of these buildings, and a sample of 25 archetypes of varying heights, i.e., 10–30 stories, is selected to evaluate their seismic performance. The results indicate a high risk of collapse, ranging from 9% to 29% in 50 years, significantly higher than the collapse risk target of 1% in 50 years in US standards. The results also indicate that collapse risk can be significantly underestimated when (1) taxonomy-level fragility functions are employed to characterize the performance of this unique typology of buildings, and (2) when the ground motion amplification effects of the Georgia sedimentary basin below Metro Vancouver are neglected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-15235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collapse Risk of Tall Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings

Kenneth J. Elwood, Preetish Kakoty, Carlos Molina Hutt
1 citations
Journal of Structural Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
article

Collapse Risk of Tall Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings

Kenneth J. Elwood, Preetish Kakoty, Carlos Molina Hutt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Existing buildings, particularly those predating modern building codes, pose significant seismic risk in regions of high seismicity worldwide. In the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, reinforced concrete shear wall (RCSW) buildings are prevalent in the construction of tall buildings. Many of these buildings were constructed before the introduction of ductility requirements in the Canadian concrete standard during the mid-1980s, and they predominantly serve as residences for renters, seniors, and low-income populations. This study quantifies the collapse risk of these tall nonductile RCSW buildings to understand their seismic vulnerability. Leveraging a comprehensive database of pre-1980 RCSW buildings, a framework is proposed to generate representative archetypes using a random forest regression model. An automated workflow is developed to facilitate nonlinear structural analyses of these buildings, and a sample of 25 archetypes of varying heights, i.e., 10–30 stories, is selected to evaluate their seismic performance. The results indicate a high risk of collapse, ranging from 9% to 29% in 50 years, significantly higher than the collapse risk target of 1% in 50 years in US standards. The results also indicate that collapse risk can be significantly underestimated when (1) taxonomy-level fragility functions are employed to characterize the performance of this unique typology of buildings, and (2) when the ground motion amplification effects of the Georgia sedimentary basin below Metro Vancouver are neglected.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 152(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Auckland (NZ), Employment Agency (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.