Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original at https://theconversation.com/two-ai-copyright-cases-two-very-different-outcomes-heres-why-270229 .

Authors

Hayleigh Bosher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-7469)

Institutions

University of London (GB)
Universidad de Londres (MX)
Brunel University of London (GB)

Publication Details

Published: 2025-12-01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64628/ab.wreajhqdf
Primary Topic: Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why

Hayleigh Bosher

Dec 1, 2025

Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

article

Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why

Hayleigh Bosher

December 1, 2025article en

Abstract

University of London (GB), Universidad de Londres (MX), Brunel University of London (GB)

Openalex Percentile: Top 80%

Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two AI copyright cases, two very different outcomes – here’s why — Hayleigh Bosher · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS