Evaluating Gaussian processes for matched-field processing localization using minimum mean squared error criterion

Gaussian processes (GPs) can densify and denoise sparsely sampled signals and have been applied in matched-field processing (MFP) localization to improve localization accuracy and robustness. Given a known true field, the minimum mean squared error criterion is proposed to evaluate the performance of GP interpolation and its application in MFP localization. This approach allows for the performance comparison of different kernel functions and likelihood functions, assisting in identifying the optimal hyperparameters, interpolation results, and localization outcomes. It also highlights possible challenges faced by existing GP methods under limited data conditions while establishing a performance upper bound for GPs-MFP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0041792
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Gaussian processes for matched-field processing localization using minimum mean squared error criterion

Peter Gerstoft, Haiqiang Niu, Zhenglin Li, Yonggang Guo et al.
JASA Express Letters
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
article

Evaluating Gaussian processes for matched-field processing localization using minimum mean squared error criterion

Peter Gerstoft, Haiqiang Niu, Zhenglin Li, Yonggang Guo, Shanru Lin
article en

Abstract

Gaussian processes (GPs) can densify and denoise sparsely sampled signals and have been applied in matched-field processing (MFP) localization to improve localization accuracy and robustness. Given a known true field, the minimum mean squared error criterion is proposed to evaluate the performance of GP interpolation and its application in MFP localization. This approach allows for the performance comparison of different kernel functions and likelihood functions, assisting in identifying the optimal hyperparameters, interpolation results, and localization outcomes. It also highlights possible challenges faced by existing GP methods under limited data conditions while establishing a performance upper bound for GPs-MFP.

JASA Express LettersVol. 5(12)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), University of California San Diego (US), Institute of Acoustics (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Gaussian processes for matched-field processing localization using minimum mean squared error criterion — Peter Gerstoft, Haiqiang Niu, et al. · JASA Express Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS