How Out-Party Cues Cause Citizens to Shift Their Policy Preferences

Do out-party cues polarise? More precisely, do citizens turn away from policy viewpoints when they are confronted with information indicating that these viewpoints are supported by a political party they dislike? The answer to this question is contested in the literature. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate by examining the mechanisms that lead people to respond negatively to out-party cues in the absence of in-party cues. Using data from a survey experiment in Belgium, the study suggests that two distinct mechanisms are at play. The effect is partly indirect: being exposed to out-party cues makes citizens (sometimes incorrectly) update their assumptions of the policy position of their own party, and this explains their subsequent opinion change. There is also a direct effect, however: citizens dissociate themselves from the out-party and, consequently, move to an opposing policy position. Additionally, the paper examines the significance of the degree of dislike. The results show that not much aversion is needed for partisan electorates to polarise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics of the Low Countries
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54195/plc.21810
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Out-Party Cues Cause Citizens to Shift Their Policy Preferences

Patrick F. A. van Erkel, Julie Sevenans
Politics of the Low Countries
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

How Out-Party Cues Cause Citizens to Shift Their Policy Preferences

Patrick F. A. van Erkel, Julie Sevenans
article en

Abstract

Do out-party cues polarise? More precisely, do citizens turn away from policy viewpoints when they are confronted with information indicating that these viewpoints are supported by a political party they dislike? The answer to this question is contested in the literature. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate by examining the mechanisms that lead people to respond negatively to out-party cues in the absence of in-party cues. Using data from a survey experiment in Belgium, the study suggests that two distinct mechanisms are at play. The effect is partly indirect: being exposed to out-party cues makes citizens (sometimes incorrectly) update their assumptions of the policy position of their own party, and this explains their subsequent opinion change. There is also a direct effect, however: citizens dissociate themselves from the out-party and, consequently, move to an opposing policy position. Additionally, the paper examines the significance of the degree of dislike. The results show that not much aversion is needed for partisan electorates to polarise.

Politics of the Low CountriesVol. 7(1)
University of Antwerp (BE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Antwerpen, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Out-Party Cues Cause Citizens to Shift Their Policy Preferences — Patrick F. A. van Erkel, Julie Sevenans · Politics of the Low Countries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS