Delphi Validation of a Rubric for IkasLab Spaces for Active and Global Learning

Innovative learning environments such as IkasLab demand evaluation instruments that connect spatial design with pedagogical, cognitive, and technological dimensions; however, no validated tools currently address this need. This study aimed to develop and validate a rubric for assessing IkasLab classrooms, conceived as active learning environments that foster cognitive and metacognitive processes. A two-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of 13 experts in learning spaces, cognitive processes, and ICT. Quantitative assessments and qualitative contributions were analysed, and the expert competence index (K = 0.835) confirmed a high level of expertise and consensus. The resulting rubric is organised into four blocks—social learning spaces, learner-centred environments, spaces for reflective thinking, and spaces for deep learning—each linked to specific cognitive processes derived from established theoretical frameworks. The validated instrument offers a structured and coherent framework for examining how spatial, cognitive, and technological components interact within IkasLab environments. The findings contribute theoretically by articulating a model that associates physical learning spaces with cognitive processes, and practically by providing an evidence-based tool for teachers, designers, and policymakers seeking to evaluate or implement active, flexible, and cognitively oriented learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121610
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delphi Validation of a Rubric for IkasLab Spaces for Active and Global Learning

Naiara Bilbao Quintana, Arantzazu López de la Serna, Aitor Yañez-Perea
Education Sciences
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

Delphi Validation of a Rubric for IkasLab Spaces for Active and Global Learning

Naiara Bilbao Quintana, Arantzazu López de la Serna, Aitor Yañez-Perea
article en

Abstract

Innovative learning environments such as IkasLab demand evaluation instruments that connect spatial design with pedagogical, cognitive, and technological dimensions; however, no validated tools currently address this need. This study aimed to develop and validate a rubric for assessing IkasLab classrooms, conceived as active learning environments that foster cognitive and metacognitive processes. A two-round Delphi study was conducted with a panel of 13 experts in learning spaces, cognitive processes, and ICT. Quantitative assessments and qualitative contributions were analysed, and the expert competence index (K = 0.835) confirmed a high level of expertise and consensus. The resulting rubric is organised into four blocks—social learning spaces, learner-centred environments, spaces for reflective thinking, and spaces for deep learning—each linked to specific cognitive processes derived from established theoretical frameworks. The validated instrument offers a structured and coherent framework for examining how spatial, cognitive, and technological components interact within IkasLab environments. The findings contribute theoretically by articulating a model that associates physical learning spaces with cognitive processes, and practically by providing an evidence-based tool for teachers, designers, and policymakers seeking to evaluate or implement active, flexible, and cognitively oriented learning environments.

Education SciencesVol. 15(12)
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.