Safety through automation: advancing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to preserve motor function

Abstract Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) uses electrical stimulation to track neural integrity during high-risk surgeries. A key challenge is that stimulation to assess integrity of motor pathways induces patient movement, disrupting the surgical field. This causes irregular application of stimulation and therefore surveillance gaps. This emphasizes the need for automated, adaptive strategies. We retrospectively analyzed stimulation intervals in 130 procedures across two centers, comparing transcranial (TES) and direct cortical stimulation (DCS). Stimulation patterns varied markedly within and across surgeries and centers. We propose a closed-loop workflow combining accelerometer-based movement tracking, and machine learning (ML) based signal forecasting. Such a system could adapt stimulation to surgical context and use ML to reduce variability, supporting consistent motor surveillance in minimally invasive neurosurgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
at - Automatisierungstechnik
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2025-0090
Primary Topic
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety through automation: advancing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to preserve motor function

Pablo Alvarez Abut, Manuela Eugster, Qendresa Parduzi, Kathleen Seidel et al.
at - Automatisierungstechnik
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
article

Safety through automation: advancing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to preserve motor function

Pablo Alvarez Abut, Manuela Eugster, Qendresa Parduzi, Kathleen Seidel, Jonathan Wermelinger, Andreas Raabe, Ulf C. Schneider
article en

Abstract

Abstract Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) uses electrical stimulation to track neural integrity during high-risk surgeries. A key challenge is that stimulation to assess integrity of motor pathways induces patient movement, disrupting the surgical field. This causes irregular application of stimulation and therefore surveillance gaps. This emphasizes the need for automated, adaptive strategies. We retrospectively analyzed stimulation intervals in 130 procedures across two centers, comparing transcranial (TES) and direct cortical stimulation (DCS). Stimulation patterns varied markedly within and across surgeries and centers. We propose a closed-loop workflow combining accelerometer-based movement tracking, and machine learning (ML) based signal forecasting. Such a system could adapt stimulation to surgical context and use ML to reduce variability, supporting consistent motor surveillance in minimally invasive neurosurgery.

at - AutomatisierungstechnikVol. 73(12)
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Lucerne (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety through automation: advancing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to preserve motor function — Pablo Alvarez Abut, Manuela Eugster, et al. · at - Automatisierungstechnik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS