Extended seasonal prediction of Antarctic sea ice concentration using ANTSIC-UNet

Abstract. Antarctic sea ice has experienced rapid change in recent years, with the total sea ice extent abruptly decreasing after a period of gradual increase from the late 1970s until 2014. Accurate long-term predictions of Antarctic sea ice concentration by dynamical or machine learning models are crucial for supporting the expanding activities in the Southern Ocean, related to for instance scientific research, tourism and fisheries. However, dynamical models often face difficulties in accurately predicting Antarctic sea ice due to limited representations of air-ice-sea interactions, especially on seasonal timescales and during the summer months. In addition, existing deep learning approaches typically rely on historical sea ice data, neglecting the complex interactions between sea ice and other climate variables, and lack interpretability of the underlying physical processes. Moreover, little attention has been paid to extended seasonal forecasts, and systematic evaluations of the predictive skill during extreme years remain scarce. To address these challenges and gaps, we here develop a deep learning model (named ANTSIC-UNet), trained by multiple climate variables, and evaluate its skill for extended up-to-six-months seasonal prediction of Antarctic sea ice concentration. We compare the predictive skill of ANTSIC-UNet in the Pan- and regional Antarctic with two benchmark models (a linear trend and an anomaly persistence model) and a dynamical model (SEAS5). In terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) of sea ice concentration and integrated ice-edge error (IIEE), ANTSIC-UNet shows much better skills relative to the other models for the extended seasonal prediction, especially for the extreme events in recent years. Sea ice prediction errors increase with lead time, and are smaller during autumn and winter than in summer. The Pacific and Indian Oceans show accurate prediction performance at the sea ice edge during summer, and ANTSIC-UNet provides high predictive skill in capturing the interannual variability of Pan-Antarctic and regional sea ice extent anomalies. In addition, we quantify the importance of variables through a post-hoc interpretation method. This analysis suggests that the ANTSIC-UNet prediction at short lead times is sensitive to sea surface temperature, radiative flux, and atmospheric circulation in addition to sea ice conditions. At longer lead times, zonal wind in the stratosphere appears to be an important influencing factor for the prediction. Building on these findings, we further demonstrate that incorporating physical constraints into deep learning models potentially leads to a gain in the accuracy of the Antarctic sea ice edge prediction on extended seasonal timescales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6381-2025
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extended seasonal prediction of Antarctic sea ice concentration using ANTSIC-UNet

Yongyun Hu, Lu Zhou, Ke Fan, Rune Grand Graversen et al.
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Extended seasonal prediction of Antarctic sea ice concentration using ANTSIC-UNet

Yongyun Hu, Lu Zhou, Ke Fan, Rune Grand Graversen, Qinghua Yang, Mirong Song, Ziying Yang, Jiping Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Antarctic sea ice has experienced rapid change in recent years, with the total sea ice extent abruptly decreasing after a period of gradual increase from the late 1970s until 2014. Accurate long-term predictions of Antarctic sea ice concentration by dynamical or machine learning models are crucial for supporting the expanding activities in the Southern Ocean, related to for instance scientific research, tourism and fisheries. However, dynamical models often face difficulties in accurately predicting Antarctic sea ice due to limited representations of air-ice-sea interactions, especially on seasonal timescales and during the summer months. In addition, existing deep learning approaches typically rely on historical sea ice data, neglecting the complex interactions between sea ice and other climate variables, and lack interpretability of the underlying physical processes. Moreover, little attention has been paid to extended seasonal forecasts, and systematic evaluations of the predictive skill during extreme years remain scarce. To address these challenges and gaps, we here develop a deep learning model (named ANTSIC-UNet), trained by multiple climate variables, and evaluate its skill for extended up-to-six-months seasonal prediction of Antarctic sea ice concentration. We compare the predictive skill of ANTSIC-UNet in the Pan- and regional Antarctic with two benchmark models (a linear trend and an anomaly persistence model) and a dynamical model (SEAS5). In terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) of sea ice concentration and integrated ice-edge error (IIEE), ANTSIC-UNet shows much better skills relative to the other models for the extended seasonal prediction, especially for the extreme events in recent years. Sea ice prediction errors increase with lead time, and are smaller during autumn and winter than in summer. The Pacific and Indian Oceans show accurate prediction performance at the sea ice edge during summer, and ANTSIC-UNet provides high predictive skill in capturing the interannual variability of Pan-Antarctic and regional sea ice extent anomalies. In addition, we quantify the importance of variables through a post-hoc interpretation method. This analysis suggests that the ANTSIC-UNet prediction at short lead times is sensitive to sea surface temperature, radiative flux, and atmospheric circulation in addition to sea ice conditions. At longer lead times, zonal wind in the stratosphere appears to be an important influencing factor for the prediction. Building on these findings, we further demonstrate that incorporating physical constraints into deep learning models potentially leads to a gain in the accuracy of the Antarctic sea ice edge prediction on extended seasonal timescales.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(12)
Polar Research Institute of China (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (RU), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (CN), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Sun Yat-sen University, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.