Recovery strategies as dynamic capabilities: Differential mediation effects of proactive and reactive approaches in the supply chain disruption-productivity relationship

Purpose. This study investigates how supply chain disruptions affect firm productivity and examines the differential mediating roles of proactive and reactive recovery strategies in manufacturing firms operating in emerging economies. Methodology. Drawing on the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the research employs a cross-sectional survey design with data collected from 250 pharmaceutical and automotive manufacturing firms in Ghana. Structural Equation Modelling using SmartPLS 4.0 with bootstrapping procedures (5,000 subsamples) was applied to test direct effects and mediation hypotheses. Results. Supply chain disruptions negatively impact firm productivity (β = -0.247, p = 0.001). Proactive recovery strategies significantly mediate this relationship with a large positive indirect effect (β = 0.396, p < 0.001), indicating that anticipatory capabilities substantially buffer disruption-induced productivity losses. Reactive recovery strategies show no significant mediating effect (β = -0.039, p = 0.452), suggesting that post-disruption responses alone are insufficient for maintaining productivity. Theoretical contribution. The study advances supply chain resilience theory by reconceptualizing recovery strategies as dynamic capabilities with differential effectiveness. It provides empirical evidence distinguishing proactive from reactive mechanisms and demonstrates that the indirect effect of proactive recovery substantially exceeds the direct negative effect of disruptions, indicating that well-developed anticipatory capabilities can more than offset disruption impacts. Practical implications. Supply chain managers should prioritize investments in proactive recovery capabilities, including supply base diversification, contingency planning, scenario analysis, and real-time monitoring systems. For transport and logistics firms, proactive strategies such as alternative routing plans, carrier diversification, and fleet redundancy represent critical resilience investments with measurable productivity returns. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2025.10-2.10
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery strategies as dynamic capabilities: Differential mediation effects of proactive and reactive approaches in the supply chain disruption-productivity relationship

Elizabeth Ayamga, Richmond Wardie Darko
Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Recovery strategies as dynamic capabilities: Differential mediation effects of proactive and reactive approaches in the supply chain disruption-productivity relationship

Elizabeth Ayamga, Richmond Wardie Darko
article en

Abstract

Purpose. This study investigates how supply chain disruptions affect firm productivity and examines the differential mediating roles of proactive and reactive recovery strategies in manufacturing firms operating in emerging economies. Methodology. Drawing on the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the research employs a cross-sectional survey design with data collected from 250 pharmaceutical and automotive manufacturing firms in Ghana. Structural Equation Modelling using SmartPLS 4.0 with bootstrapping procedures (5,000 subsamples) was applied to test direct effects and mediation hypotheses. Results. Supply chain disruptions negatively impact firm productivity (β = -0.247, p = 0.001). Proactive recovery strategies significantly mediate this relationship with a large positive indirect effect (β = 0.396, p < 0.001), indicating that anticipatory capabilities substantially buffer disruption-induced productivity losses. Reactive recovery strategies show no significant mediating effect (β = -0.039, p = 0.452), suggesting that post-disruption responses alone are insufficient for maintaining productivity. Theoretical contribution. The study advances supply chain resilience theory by reconceptualizing recovery strategies as dynamic capabilities with differential effectiveness. It provides empirical evidence distinguishing proactive from reactive mechanisms and demonstrates that the indirect effect of proactive recovery substantially exceeds the direct negative effect of disruptions, indicating that well-developed anticipatory capabilities can more than offset disruption impacts. Practical implications. Supply chain managers should prioritize investments in proactive recovery capabilities, including supply base diversification, contingency planning, scenario analysis, and real-time monitoring systems. For transport and logistics firms, proactive strategies such as alternative routing plans, carrier diversification, and fleet redundancy represent critical resilience investments with measurable productivity returns. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and LogisticsVol. 10(2)
Accra Technical University (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.