Eye metrics often reflect visual conscious awareness, conscious content, and neural processing in cerebral blindness

Cerebral blindness is caused by damage to the primary visual pathway. Some people with cerebral blindness retain degraded vision and non-visual sensations and can perform visually guided behaviors within their blind visual field. These cases raise questions about visual conscious perception and residual neural processing in cerebral blindness. A major challenge in this research is that subjective reporting on experiences in the blind field can be unreliable. Alternatively, eye metrics offer a promising objective marker of conscious awareness, conscious content, and brain activity. In this study, we recorded visual stimulus-evoked pupil size, blink, and microsaccade responses in neurotypical participants and both the sighted and blind fields of cerebrally blind participants. For most patients, we found that eye metrics inferred conscious awareness in the blind field. Also, pupil size responded to both real and illusory stimulus luminance in the sighted field but not in the blind field. Furthermore, eye metrics were linked to visual stimulus-evoked occipital cortical field potentials in the blind field, suggesting residual cortical processing. These findings support eye metrics as an indicator of visual conscious perception and neural processing in cerebral blindness, with potential applications for tracking vision recovery following damage to the primary visual pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08945-5
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye metrics often reflect visual conscious awareness, conscious content, and neural processing in cerebral blindness

Shruti Japee, Elisha P. Merriam, Peter A. Bandettini, Benjamin Osborne et al.
Communications Biology
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Eye metrics often reflect visual conscious awareness, conscious content, and neural processing in cerebral blindness

Shruti Japee, Elisha P. Merriam, Peter A. Bandettini, Benjamin Osborne, Sharif I. Kronemer, Victoria E. Gobo, Tina T. Liu
article en

Abstract

Cerebral blindness is caused by damage to the primary visual pathway. Some people with cerebral blindness retain degraded vision and non-visual sensations and can perform visually guided behaviors within their blind visual field. These cases raise questions about visual conscious perception and residual neural processing in cerebral blindness. A major challenge in this research is that subjective reporting on experiences in the blind field can be unreliable. Alternatively, eye metrics offer a promising objective marker of conscious awareness, conscious content, and brain activity. In this study, we recorded visual stimulus-evoked pupil size, blink, and microsaccade responses in neurotypical participants and both the sighted and blind fields of cerebrally blind participants. For most patients, we found that eye metrics inferred conscious awareness in the blind field. Also, pupil size responded to both real and illusory stimulus luminance in the sighted field but not in the blind field. Furthermore, eye metrics were linked to visual stimulus-evoked occipital cortical field potentials in the blind field, suggesting residual cortical processing. These findings support eye metrics as an indicator of visual conscious perception and neural processing in cerebral blindness, with potential applications for tracking vision recovery following damage to the primary visual pathway.

Communications BiologyVol. 8(1)
National Institutes of Health (US), Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Clinical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.