Ethics, generative AI and science communication

In this essay, we argue that the applications of generative-AI technologies to science communication need careful consideration to ensure such uses are desirable, and socially and ethically acceptable. In early applications of GenAI in science communication, especially in public media, there has been swift and overwhelmingly negative response to news about its use. Drawing on existing literature about generative-AI in adjacent fields to science communication, and on the scholarship on the ethics of science communication, this article maps out the key ethical issues that the use of generative-AI technologies raise for science communication. Specifically, acknowledging that generative-AI is more than an output-producing technology but is a constellation of governance, infrastructure, data, human and computing operating systems, we argue that three dimensions of ethical concerns need to be explored: the communication <i>outputs</i> of generative AI; the social and environmental <i>impacts</i> of using generative AI technologies in science communication and the <i>narratives</i> we tell about AI technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251393621
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics, generative AI and science communication

Michelle Riedlinger, Hannah R. Feldman, Fabien Medvecky
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Ethics, generative AI and science communication

Michelle Riedlinger, Hannah R. Feldman, Fabien Medvecky
article en

Abstract

In this essay, we argue that the applications of generative-AI technologies to science communication need careful consideration to ensure such uses are desirable, and socially and ethically acceptable. In early applications of GenAI in science communication, especially in public media, there has been swift and overwhelmingly negative response to news about its use. Drawing on existing literature about generative-AI in adjacent fields to science communication, and on the scholarship on the ethics of science communication, this article maps out the key ethical issues that the use of generative-AI technologies raise for science communication. Specifically, acknowledging that generative-AI is more than an output-producing technology but is a constellation of governance, infrastructure, data, human and computing operating systems, we argue that three dimensions of ethical concerns need to be explored: the communication <i>outputs</i> of generative AI; the social and environmental <i>impacts</i> of using generative AI technologies in science communication and the <i>narratives</i> we tell about AI technology.

Public Understanding of Science
Australian National University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethics, generative AI and science communication — Michelle Riedlinger, Hannah R. Feldman, et al. · Public Understanding of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS