Reading between the lines. Older people’s maltreatment - from detection to reporting in primary healthcare

The issue of older people's maltreatment (OPM) is gaining increased attention worldwide because of its significant short and long-term severe consequences. Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting, reporting, and managing these cases, but many difficulties in these procedures exist, and underreporting is very frequent. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the extent of and difficulties in detecting and reporting suspected OPM cases by general practitioner physicians in Portugal. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among general practice physicians (GPPs) to assess their perceptions, experiences, and challenges in detecting and reporting older people maltreatment (OPM). The 13-item questionnaire explored sociodemographic factors, responsibility, confidence, reporting practices, and training needs, providing an updated insight into OPM management in primary healthcare. It was anonymous and conducted through a self-report questionnaire distributed in paper format to GPPs working in the National Health Service in the Northern of Portugal. We received 356 completed questionnaires for further analysis. The findings indicate that, on average, physicians suspect fewer than one OPM case per year; only 32% suspected at least one case in the previous year, although 55.3% and 54.5% of the physician's revealed confidence in identifying signs of physical abuse and neglect, respectively. The ambiguity of the psychological symptoms was identified as a great challenge in detection (50.3%). Only 36.5% of the physicians were acquainted with the procedures for reporting suspected cases; however, of the 32% who suspected at least of one case in the previous year, only 39.5% reported all or at least some suspected cases; 16.9% chose not to report the case when requested by the victim or his/her caregivers. Most (91.6%) expressed a willingness to adopt protocols to assist them in managing such cases. A correlation was found between physicians' satisfaction with OPM reporting training during undergraduate and postgraduate education and their ability to report (p = 0.024), as well as with the number of reported cases (p = 0.003). Thus, the detection and reporting of OPM by physicians remain major challenges that need to be overcome. Further research and greater awareness of the importance of these procedures are essential to ensure victims' protection, safety, and health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25394-1
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading between the lines. Older people’s maltreatment - from detection to reporting in primary healthcare

S. Frazão, Teresa Magalhães, Caio C. A. Morais, Pedro Norton
BMC Public Health
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Reading between the lines. Older people’s maltreatment - from detection to reporting in primary healthcare

S. Frazão, Teresa Magalhães, Caio C. A. Morais, Pedro Norton
article en

Abstract

The issue of older people's maltreatment (OPM) is gaining increased attention worldwide because of its significant short and long-term severe consequences. Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting, reporting, and managing these cases, but many difficulties in these procedures exist, and underreporting is very frequent. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the extent of and difficulties in detecting and reporting suspected OPM cases by general practitioner physicians in Portugal. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among general practice physicians (GPPs) to assess their perceptions, experiences, and challenges in detecting and reporting older people maltreatment (OPM). The 13-item questionnaire explored sociodemographic factors, responsibility, confidence, reporting practices, and training needs, providing an updated insight into OPM management in primary healthcare. It was anonymous and conducted through a self-report questionnaire distributed in paper format to GPPs working in the National Health Service in the Northern of Portugal. We received 356 completed questionnaires for further analysis. The findings indicate that, on average, physicians suspect fewer than one OPM case per year; only 32% suspected at least one case in the previous year, although 55.3% and 54.5% of the physician's revealed confidence in identifying signs of physical abuse and neglect, respectively. The ambiguity of the psychological symptoms was identified as a great challenge in detection (50.3%). Only 36.5% of the physicians were acquainted with the procedures for reporting suspected cases; however, of the 32% who suspected at least of one case in the previous year, only 39.5% reported all or at least some suspected cases; 16.9% chose not to report the case when requested by the victim or his/her caregivers. Most (91.6%) expressed a willingness to adopt protocols to assist them in managing such cases. A correlation was found between physicians' satisfaction with OPM reporting training during undergraduate and postgraduate education and their ability to report (p = 0.024), as well as with the number of reported cases (p = 0.003). Thus, the detection and reporting of OPM by physicians remain major challenges that need to be overcome. Further research and greater awareness of the importance of these procedures are essential to ensure victims' protection, safety, and health.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital de São João (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Instituto de Saúde (BR), Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (PT), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Minho (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.