Correction: Effects of experimental canopy openness on wood-inhabiting fungal fruiting diversity across succession

Due to an error during the labelling of the 'treatment-based alpha diversity' variable, the group labels for 'common' , 'dominant' and 'rare' were inadvertently given as 'rare ' , 'common' and 'dominant' , respectively.Consequently, in the Results section, "However, temporal responses of fungal diversity differed when response trends and confidence intervals were considered: treatment-based alpha diversity of rare and common species showed similar trends in the first years but diverging trends in later years between microclimate treatments; in later years, rare and common species showed lower alpha diversity trends in open canopies (Fig. 3).The responses were stronger for communities on fir than beech.Treatment-based alpha diversity of dominant species showed almost non-distinguishable trends between closed and open canopies, with mainly overlapping confidence intervals (Fig. 3).Communities on fir showed lower treatment-based alpha diversity in open compared to closed canopies throughout the succession, a trend which increased over time for rare and common and remained constant for dominant species (Fig. 3)."