Thinking inside the box: do hiding boxes reduce the fear and stress of hospitalised cats?

Question In hospitalised domestic cats, does the use of hiding boxes compared to no intervention reduce fear and stress? Clinical bottom line The category of research question was: Treatment. The number and type of study designs that were critically appraised were: Five studies were critically reviewed. All five studies were defined by the researchers as randomised control trials. Critical appraisal of the selected papers meeting the inclusion criteria collectively provide zero/weak/moderate/strong evidence in terms of their experimental design and implementation: Moderate. The outcomes reported are summarised as follows… Four of the five studies showed moderate evidence that hiding boxes reduce fear and stress in cats, with reduced cat stress scores (CSS) in cats given a hiding box compared to control groups. The hiding box was found more useful in aggressive cats as CSS reduced faster in these groups. Among the three studies that recorded objective physiological stress measures (e.g., temperature, salivary cortisol), two studies showed no statistically significant stress reductions between the hiding box and control groups. Only one study of these three found lower heart rates in hiding box cats, but this may have been influenced by confounding factors. In view of the strength of evidence and the outcomes from the studies the following conclusion is made… There is moderate evidence suggesting that the use of hiding boxes in hospitalised cats is associated with reduced stress. The strength of the evidence is considered moderate due to varying limitations (e.g., small sample sizes) in the reviewed studies. Despite these limitations, incorporating a plastic or single-use disposable cardboard hiding box into existing feline-friendly cage environments is recommended for consideration. However, the use of a hiding box should be determined on a case-by-case basis as it may not be suitable for all patients (e.g. critical care patients requiring constant visualisation). High-standard infection control protocols should be applied to ensure the hiding box does not act as a fomite for possible infection transmission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Evidence
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v10i4.727
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking inside the box: do hiding boxes reduce the fear and stress of hospitalised cats?

Lauren Foster
Veterinary Evidence
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Thinking inside the box: do hiding boxes reduce the fear and stress of hospitalised cats?

Lauren Foster
article en

Abstract

Question In hospitalised domestic cats, does the use of hiding boxes compared to no intervention reduce fear and stress? Clinical bottom line The category of research question was: Treatment. The number and type of study designs that were critically appraised were: Five studies were critically reviewed. All five studies were defined by the researchers as randomised control trials. Critical appraisal of the selected papers meeting the inclusion criteria collectively provide zero/weak/moderate/strong evidence in terms of their experimental design and implementation: Moderate. The outcomes reported are summarised as follows… Four of the five studies showed moderate evidence that hiding boxes reduce fear and stress in cats, with reduced cat stress scores (CSS) in cats given a hiding box compared to control groups. The hiding box was found more useful in aggressive cats as CSS reduced faster in these groups. Among the three studies that recorded objective physiological stress measures (e.g., temperature, salivary cortisol), two studies showed no statistically significant stress reductions between the hiding box and control groups. Only one study of these three found lower heart rates in hiding box cats, but this may have been influenced by confounding factors. In view of the strength of evidence and the outcomes from the studies the following conclusion is made… There is moderate evidence suggesting that the use of hiding boxes in hospitalised cats is associated with reduced stress. The strength of the evidence is considered moderate due to varying limitations (e.g., small sample sizes) in the reviewed studies. Despite these limitations, incorporating a plastic or single-use disposable cardboard hiding box into existing feline-friendly cage environments is recommended for consideration. However, the use of a hiding box should be determined on a case-by-case basis as it may not be suitable for all patients (e.g. critical care patients requiring constant visualisation). High-standard infection control protocols should be applied to ensure the hiding box does not act as a fomite for possible infection transmission.

Veterinary EvidenceVol. 10(4)
Eastern Institute of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.