Seismic Enhancement of Masonry‐Infilled Substandard Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Lightweight Steel Exoskeleton

ABSTRACT A significant portion of existing reinforced concrete (RC) structures in seismically active regions was constructed prior to the adoption of modern seismic design standards, leaving them highly susceptible to earthquake‐induced damage. The vulnerabilities of these structures, often exacerbated by material degradation, have been starkly revealed in recent seismic events. This study addresses the urgent need for effective retrofitting solutions by evaluating the seismic performance of deficient masonry‐infilled RC frames retrofitted with a novel lightweight steel exoskeleton system—Resisto 5.9 Tube—designed to enhance structural resilience. Three full‐scale RC frame specimens, replicating typical deficiencies of older construction practices, were subjected to quasi‐static cyclic loading up to near‐collapse conditions, with interstory drifts ranging from 0.05% to 2.50%. The test series included: a bare frame (BF), an infilled frame with unreinforced hollow clay masonry units (IF), and a retrofitted infilled frame (RIF) incorporating the steel exoskeleton. Results reveal that masonry infill substantially increases lateral load capacity—by factors of 2.42 (IF) and 3.59 (RIF) compared to BF. However, IF exhibited a brittle failure mode, with significantly reduced displacement capacity. In contrast, the exoskeleton‐enhanced RIF demonstrated a 147% increase in load capacity relative to IF, extended peak force occurrence to 0.70% drift, and achieved improved cyclic stability. While initial stiffness remained comparable between IF and RIF (within 4% difference), energy dissipation in RIF at 1.50% drift was threefold that of IF. Further, the exoskeleton system markedly improved the performance of the infill wall, extending the defined limit and damage states at ultimate by up to 150% and 344%, respectively. These enhancements facilitated sustained infill–frame interaction under large drifts, a behavior often neglected in conventional seismic design. The findings position the Resisto 5.9 Tube as a cost‐effective and scalable retrofitting solution, offering a paradigm shift in how infill contributions are considered in seismic response assessments. This work establishes a foundation for advanced analytical modeling and practical implementation in earthquake‐prone regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70102
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Enhancement of Masonry‐Infilled Substandard Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Lightweight Steel Exoskeleton

Paolo Morandi, Simone Galano, Uğurhan Akyüz, İsmail Ozan Demirel
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
article

Seismic Enhancement of Masonry‐Infilled Substandard Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Lightweight Steel Exoskeleton

Paolo Morandi, Simone Galano, Uğurhan Akyüz, İsmail Ozan Demirel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A significant portion of existing reinforced concrete (RC) structures in seismically active regions was constructed prior to the adoption of modern seismic design standards, leaving them highly susceptible to earthquake‐induced damage. The vulnerabilities of these structures, often exacerbated by material degradation, have been starkly revealed in recent seismic events. This study addresses the urgent need for effective retrofitting solutions by evaluating the seismic performance of deficient masonry‐infilled RC frames retrofitted with a novel lightweight steel exoskeleton system—Resisto 5.9 Tube—designed to enhance structural resilience. Three full‐scale RC frame specimens, replicating typical deficiencies of older construction practices, were subjected to quasi‐static cyclic loading up to near‐collapse conditions, with interstory drifts ranging from 0.05% to 2.50%. The test series included: a bare frame (BF), an infilled frame with unreinforced hollow clay masonry units (IF), and a retrofitted infilled frame (RIF) incorporating the steel exoskeleton. Results reveal that masonry infill substantially increases lateral load capacity—by factors of 2.42 (IF) and 3.59 (RIF) compared to BF. However, IF exhibited a brittle failure mode, with significantly reduced displacement capacity. In contrast, the exoskeleton‐enhanced RIF demonstrated a 147% increase in load capacity relative to IF, extended peak force occurrence to 0.70% drift, and achieved improved cyclic stability. While initial stiffness remained comparable between IF and RIF (within 4% difference), energy dissipation in RIF at 1.50% drift was threefold that of IF. Further, the exoskeleton system markedly improved the performance of the infill wall, extending the defined limit and damage states at ultimate by up to 150% and 344%, respectively. These enhancements facilitated sustained infill–frame interaction under large drifts, a behavior often neglected in conventional seismic design. The findings position the Resisto 5.9 Tube as a cost‐effective and scalable retrofitting solution, offering a paradigm shift in how infill contributions are considered in seismic response assessments. This work establishes a foundation for advanced analytical modeling and practical implementation in earthquake‐prone regions.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 55(3)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Strathclyde (GB), Middle East Technical University (TR), European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (IT)
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.