Metal artifact reduction in spectral computed tomography for intracavity brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients: a prospective study

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining virtual monochromatic images (VMI) with metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms in reducing metal artifacts in cervical cancer patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy. Fifty cervical cancer patients scheduled for intracavitary brachytherapy underwent spectral computed tomography (CT) images. VMI + MAR/no-MAR were reconstructed at energies ranging from 40 to 140 keV. CT attenuation and image noise (standard deviation) were measured to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the most prominent artifacts, and the artifact index (AI) for the cervix, bladder, and rectum. Objective metrics were compared between the VMI + MAR and VMI + no-MAR groups. Subjective image quality was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, focusing on artifact reduction, soft tissue contrast, and contouring preference. Geometric distortion was assessed by measuring the long axis, short axis, and long-to-short axis ratio (L/S) of the titanium applicator. Contouring consistency was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between two radiation oncologists. VMI + MAR significantly reduced the AI for the cervix (relative 34.74%-88.51% reduction) and rectum (relative 11.31%-81.35% reduction) compared to VMI + no-MAR across all energies (all p < 0.05). SNR increased from 0.70–1.00 to 1.75–1.97, and CNR improved significantly from 90 keV onwards (p < 0.05). 140 keV + MAR achieved the highest SNR and CNR with the lowest AI. Subjective assessment further confirmed that 140 keV + MAR offered the best balance between artifact reduction and soft tissue contrast, with significantly higher scores for artifact reduction and contouring preference (p < 0.001). Distortion analysis showed that with increasing VMI energy, long (40-140 keV: from 8.10 to 6.17 mm) and short axes (40-140 keV: from 6.93 to 5.55 mm) decreased, and L/S approached 1 (p < 0.001). Contouring consistency analysis further demonstrated that 140 keV + MAR achieved the highest DSC and lowest HD95 among all energy-MAR combinations, indicating superior reproducibility of target and organ-at-risk delineations. For the investigated cases and imaging procedures, high-energy VMI combined with MAR, particularly 140 keV + MAR, provided the most effective balance of artifact reduction, geometric accuracy, and clinical contouring suitability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02767-9
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metal artifact reduction in spectral computed tomography for intracavity brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients: a prospective study

Junfang Yan, Ke Hu, Yining Chen, Zheng Zeng et al.
Radiation Oncology
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Metal artifact reduction in spectral computed tomography for intracavity brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients: a prospective study

Junfang Yan, Ke Hu, Yining Chen, Zheng Zeng, Fuquan Zhang, Bing Zhou, Yuliang Sun, Haoran Xu
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining virtual monochromatic images (VMI) with metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithms in reducing metal artifacts in cervical cancer patients undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy. Fifty cervical cancer patients scheduled for intracavitary brachytherapy underwent spectral computed tomography (CT) images. VMI + MAR/no-MAR were reconstructed at energies ranging from 40 to 140 keV. CT attenuation and image noise (standard deviation) were measured to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the most prominent artifacts, and the artifact index (AI) for the cervix, bladder, and rectum. Objective metrics were compared between the VMI + MAR and VMI + no-MAR groups. Subjective image quality was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, focusing on artifact reduction, soft tissue contrast, and contouring preference. Geometric distortion was assessed by measuring the long axis, short axis, and long-to-short axis ratio (L/S) of the titanium applicator. Contouring consistency was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between two radiation oncologists. VMI + MAR significantly reduced the AI for the cervix (relative 34.74%-88.51% reduction) and rectum (relative 11.31%-81.35% reduction) compared to VMI + no-MAR across all energies (all p < 0.05). SNR increased from 0.70–1.00 to 1.75–1.97, and CNR improved significantly from 90 keV onwards (p < 0.05). 140 keV + MAR achieved the highest SNR and CNR with the lowest AI. Subjective assessment further confirmed that 140 keV + MAR offered the best balance between artifact reduction and soft tissue contrast, with significantly higher scores for artifact reduction and contouring preference (p < 0.001). Distortion analysis showed that with increasing VMI energy, long (40-140 keV: from 8.10 to 6.17 mm) and short axes (40-140 keV: from 6.93 to 5.55 mm) decreased, and L/S approached 1 (p < 0.001). Contouring consistency analysis further demonstrated that 140 keV + MAR achieved the highest DSC and lowest HD95 among all energy-MAR combinations, indicating superior reproducibility of target and organ-at-risk delineations. For the investigated cases and imaging procedures, high-energy VMI combined with MAR, particularly 140 keV + MAR, provided the most effective balance of artifact reduction, geometric accuracy, and clinical contouring suitability.

Radiation OncologyVol. 21(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.