What makes a service plant attractive to pollinators? An exploration of the influence of plant traits among 38 flowering plant species

Global declines of pollinator communities have triggered interest in flowering plants to support pollinators in agricultural areas. Flowering plants may differ in their attractiveness for pollinators, and it is not clear which plant traits (co-)determine the attractiveness of flowering plants for different pollinator groups. Here we assessed the communities of hoverflies and bees on 38 flowering plant species by visual counts and sweep net sampling in a replicated field experiment in Korla, Xinjiang, China. There were 13 sampling rounds in 2020 and 15 in 2021. Pollinators from sweep net samples were identified to species level and their body size recorded. Flower cover, corolla depth and width, plant height, and flowering duration were assessed. A total of 2751 hoverflies, 1350 honeybees and 621 wild bees were observed using the two sampling methods. Diplotaxis tenuifolia, Foeniculum vulgare and Anethum graveolens were the most frequently visited plants. The abundance of adult hoverflies and honeybees was negatively associated with corolla depth of flowering plants in 2020, while wild bee abundance was consistently negatively associated with corolla depth across both years. Plant flowering duration not only influenced the period of pollinator abundance, but longer flowering plants also hosted a higher abundance of hoverflies and wild bees in 2021. The abundance of pollinators was not associated with flower cover. The body length of hoverflies and wild bees was not associated with flowering plant traits. Our study demonstrates the potential of trait-based approaches to predict pollinator responses to inform the selection of flowering plants. However, it also reveals interannual variability in trait-pollinator relationships, highlighting the need for continued empirical testing to ensure effective plant selection for supporting local pollinator communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110134
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What makes a service plant attractive to pollinators? An exploration of the influence of plant traits among 38 flowering plant species

Yanhui Lu, Felix J.J.A. Bianchi, Wopke van der Werf, Mengxiao Sun et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant and animal studies
article

What makes a service plant attractive to pollinators? An exploration of the influence of plant traits among 38 flowering plant species

Yanhui Lu, Felix J.J.A. Bianchi, Wopke van der Werf, Mengxiao Sun, Bing Liu
article en

Abstract

Global declines of pollinator communities have triggered interest in flowering plants to support pollinators in agricultural areas. Flowering plants may differ in their attractiveness for pollinators, and it is not clear which plant traits (co-)determine the attractiveness of flowering plants for different pollinator groups. Here we assessed the communities of hoverflies and bees on 38 flowering plant species by visual counts and sweep net sampling in a replicated field experiment in Korla, Xinjiang, China. There were 13 sampling rounds in 2020 and 15 in 2021. Pollinators from sweep net samples were identified to species level and their body size recorded. Flower cover, corolla depth and width, plant height, and flowering duration were assessed. A total of 2751 hoverflies, 1350 honeybees and 621 wild bees were observed using the two sampling methods. Diplotaxis tenuifolia, Foeniculum vulgare and Anethum graveolens were the most frequently visited plants. The abundance of adult hoverflies and honeybees was negatively associated with corolla depth of flowering plants in 2020, while wild bee abundance was consistently negatively associated with corolla depth across both years. Plant flowering duration not only influenced the period of pollinator abundance, but longer flowering plants also hosted a higher abundance of hoverflies and wild bees in 2021. The abundance of pollinators was not associated with flower cover. The body length of hoverflies and wild bees was not associated with flowering plant traits. Our study demonstrates the potential of trait-based approaches to predict pollinator responses to inform the selection of flowering plants. However, it also reveals interannual variability in trait-pollinator relationships, highlighting the need for continued empirical testing to ensure effective plant selection for supporting local pollinator communities.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 399
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.