Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos

The transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 emphasizes the need for ethical, transparent, and human-centric artificial intelligence systems. In this context, ensuring the authenticity of digital information has become crucial for maintaining societal trust. This study addresses the challenge of detecting manipulated multimedia content, including synthetic images, videos, and audio generated by artificial intelligence, commonly known as Deepfakes. We analyze and compare general-purpose and Deepfake-specific detection methods to assess their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. This work introduces a refined reference model that integrates both application-oriented and methodological criteria, grouping tools into Blind Forensic, Handcrafted Machine Learning, Deep Learning-based methods, and Toolkits. This structured taxonomy provides a clearer comparative framework than existing works, which typically classify detectors using only one of these dimensions. To ensure reproducible evaluation, all experiments were performed using the SAFL dataset, which consolidates real and synthetic multimedia content generated with publicly available tools under a unified protocol. Among the tested tools, Forensically achieved the highest accuracy in image forgery detection 86.9%, while Autopsy reached 69.5% among Deepfake-specific image detectors. In video analysis, Forensically obtained 98.6% accuracy, whereas Deepware Scanner achieved 91.2% as the most effective Deepfake-focused tool. These results highlight that general-purpose methods remain robust for images, while specialized detectors perform competitively in videos. Overall, the proposed model and dataset establish a consistent foundation for advancing hybrid detection strategies aligned with the ethical and transparent AI principles envisioned in Industry 5.0.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312664
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos

Antonio Robles-Gómez, Llanos Tobarra, Rafael Vargas, Sergio A. Falcón-López
Applied Sciences
Digital Media Forensic Detection
article

Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos

Antonio Robles-Gómez, Llanos Tobarra, Rafael Vargas, Sergio A. Falcón-López
article en

Abstract

The transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 emphasizes the need for ethical, transparent, and human-centric artificial intelligence systems. In this context, ensuring the authenticity of digital information has become crucial for maintaining societal trust. This study addresses the challenge of detecting manipulated multimedia content, including synthetic images, videos, and audio generated by artificial intelligence, commonly known as Deepfakes. We analyze and compare general-purpose and Deepfake-specific detection methods to assess their effectiveness in real-world scenarios. This work introduces a refined reference model that integrates both application-oriented and methodological criteria, grouping tools into Blind Forensic, Handcrafted Machine Learning, Deep Learning-based methods, and Toolkits. This structured taxonomy provides a clearer comparative framework than existing works, which typically classify detectors using only one of these dimensions. To ensure reproducible evaluation, all experiments were performed using the SAFL dataset, which consolidates real and synthetic multimedia content generated with publicly available tools under a unified protocol. Among the tested tools, Forensically achieved the highest accuracy in image forgery detection 86.9%, while Autopsy reached 69.5% among Deepfake-specific image detectors. In video analysis, Forensically obtained 98.6% accuracy, whereas Deepware Scanner achieved 91.2% as the most effective Deepfake-focused tool. These results highlight that general-purpose methods remain robust for images, while specialized detectors perform competitively in videos. Overall, the proposed model and dataset establish a consistent foundation for advancing hybrid detection strategies aligned with the ethical and transparent AI principles envisioned in Industry 5.0.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(23)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forensic Analysis of Manipulated Images and Videos — Antonio Robles-Gómez, Llanos Tobarra, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS