Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies

This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in inclusive education. The review aimed to examine (1) the impact of AI technologies on learning outcomes and engagement among students with special needs, (2) barriers and enablers influencing AI adoption by educators, and (3) the role of theoretical frameworks in guiding AI-based interventions. A comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, and Google Scholar for English-language, peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025. Sixteen (16) studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Findings indicate that AI tools enhance personalization, accessibility, and engagement, particularly for learners with disabilities, while barriers such as infrastructure gaps and low digital literacy persist. Enablers include institutional support and teacher training, though theoretical frameworks were inconsistently applied. Limitations include the exclusion of grey literature and reliance on short-term studies. AI can advance inclusive education when integrated with ethical, pedagogical, and institutional strategies, while future research should prioritize longitudinal, theory-driven, and culturally responsive models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312624
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies

Xiaojun Zeng, Yuyang Yan, Jiahui Li
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies

Xiaojun Zeng, Yuyang Yan, Jiahui Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in inclusive education. The review aimed to examine (1) the impact of AI technologies on learning outcomes and engagement among students with special needs, (2) barriers and enablers influencing AI adoption by educators, and (3) the role of theoretical frameworks in guiding AI-based interventions. A comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, and Google Scholar for English-language, peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025. Sixteen (16) studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Findings indicate that AI tools enhance personalization, accessibility, and engagement, particularly for learners with disabilities, while barriers such as infrastructure gaps and low digital literacy persist. Enablers include institutional support and teacher training, though theoretical frameworks were inconsistently applied. Limitations include the exclusion of grey literature and reliance on short-term studies. AI can advance inclusive education when integrated with ethical, pedagogical, and institutional strategies, while future research should prioritize longitudinal, theory-driven, and culturally responsive models.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(23)
Guangzhou University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.