Linguistic distance effects on country TOEFL scores between 2005 and 2020 and the effect of morphological distance in particular

We analysed aggregated TOEFL scores from over 15 million non-immersion learners across 127 countries and 65 first languages (L1s), spanning a 16-year period (2005–20). This extensive dataset enabled us to investigate not only the effects of various country-level characteristics – including linguistic distances – but also the dynamic nature of these effects over time. To capture complex, non-linear interactions, we applied a generalized additive mixed regression model (GAMM), with particular focus on three linguistic distance measures: morphological, lexical, and phonological. This approach allowed us to map the evolving role of morphological distance in relation to the other two dimensions. All three linguistic distance measures significantly contributed to explaining variation in L2 English proficiency at the country level. Greater linguistic distance was consistently associated with lower TOEFL scores. Morphological distance provided a distinct and competitive contribution alongside lexical and phonological distances. Importantly, all three measures interacted significantly with the year of testing, indicating that the impact of linguistic distance is not static but evolves over time. These temporal changes likely reflect the increasing global presence and dominance of English as a second language. Specifically, morphological and phonological properties gained importance at higher levels of L2 proficiency, while the influence of lexical distance gradually diminished.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Second language Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583251389484
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic distance effects on country TOEFL scores between 2005 and 2020 and the effect of morphological distance in particular

Frans van der Slik, Roeland van Hout
Second language Research
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Linguistic distance effects on country TOEFL scores between 2005 and 2020 and the effect of morphological distance in particular

Frans van der Slik, Roeland van Hout
article en

Abstract

We analysed aggregated TOEFL scores from over 15 million non-immersion learners across 127 countries and 65 first languages (L1s), spanning a 16-year period (2005–20). This extensive dataset enabled us to investigate not only the effects of various country-level characteristics – including linguistic distances – but also the dynamic nature of these effects over time. To capture complex, non-linear interactions, we applied a generalized additive mixed regression model (GAMM), with particular focus on three linguistic distance measures: morphological, lexical, and phonological. This approach allowed us to map the evolving role of morphological distance in relation to the other two dimensions. All three linguistic distance measures significantly contributed to explaining variation in L2 English proficiency at the country level. Greater linguistic distance was consistently associated with lower TOEFL scores. Morphological distance provided a distinct and competitive contribution alongside lexical and phonological distances. Importantly, all three measures interacted significantly with the year of testing, indicating that the impact of linguistic distance is not static but evolves over time. These temporal changes likely reflect the increasing global presence and dominance of English as a second language. Specifically, morphological and phonological properties gained importance at higher levels of L2 proficiency, while the influence of lexical distance gradually diminished.

Second language Research
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.