Comparative Analysis of Two Measurement Modalities for Ex Vivo Analysis of Corneal Stiffness in Porcine Corneas

Uniaxial tensile testing and atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation experiments are two valuable methods used to quantify changes in stiffness after corneal crosslinking (CXL). Here, we apply these methods by characterizing corneal stiffness ex vivo before and after CXL. Sixty-two fresh porcine corneas were divided into three groups: an untreated control group, a CXL3 group treated with the Dresden protocol, and a CXL9 group treated with the accelerated protocol. Biomechanical testing was then performed using either uniaxial tensile testing or AFM nanoindentation. Uniaxial tensile testing revealed a significant increase in corneal stiffness for the CXL3 group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 10% strain, the CXL3 and CXL9 groups exhibited increases in stiffness of 96% and 48%, respectively, compared to the control group. In contrast, AFM analysis revealed no significant differences in stiffness, showing 28% and 16% increases in the CXL3 and CXL9 groups, respectively, compared to the control group. The results suggest that uniaxial tensile testing provides a robust, sample-averaged measure of global stiffening. Interestingly, AFM nanoindentation enables mapping of localized biomechanical changes with high spatial resolution but is less sensitive to overall biomechanical changes induced by CXL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121308
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Two Measurement Modalities for Ex Vivo Analysis of Corneal Stiffness in Porcine Corneas

Isaak Fischinger, Peter Hinterdorfer, Jascha Wendelstein, Philippe Büchler et al.
Bioengineering
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparative Analysis of Two Measurement Modalities for Ex Vivo Analysis of Corneal Stiffness in Porcine Corneas

Isaak Fischinger, Peter Hinterdorfer, Jascha Wendelstein, Philippe Büchler, Matthias Bolz, Sophia A. Reifeltshammer, Malavika H. Nambiar, Hannah Seferovic, Yoo Jin Oh, Theo Seiler
article en

Abstract

Uniaxial tensile testing and atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation experiments are two valuable methods used to quantify changes in stiffness after corneal crosslinking (CXL). Here, we apply these methods by characterizing corneal stiffness ex vivo before and after CXL. Sixty-two fresh porcine corneas were divided into three groups: an untreated control group, a CXL3 group treated with the Dresden protocol, and a CXL9 group treated with the accelerated protocol. Biomechanical testing was then performed using either uniaxial tensile testing or AFM nanoindentation. Uniaxial tensile testing revealed a significant increase in corneal stiffness for the CXL3 group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 10% strain, the CXL3 and CXL9 groups exhibited increases in stiffness of 96% and 48%, respectively, compared to the control group. In contrast, AFM analysis revealed no significant differences in stiffness, showing 28% and 16% increases in the CXL3 and CXL9 groups, respectively, compared to the control group. The results suggest that uniaxial tensile testing provides a robust, sample-averaged measure of global stiffening. Interestingly, AFM nanoindentation enables mapping of localized biomechanical changes with high spatial resolution but is less sensitive to overall biomechanical changes induced by CXL.

BioengineeringVol. 12(12)
University of Bern (CH), Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Institut de Recherche en Opthalmologie (CH), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT), Internationale Akademie Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.