Review Paper — Economics and Policy of Point-Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Trading Programs

Pollution permit trading is of interest due to its potential to meet pollution control targets at minimum cost without market designers knowing polluters’ abatement costs. This potential has been substantially realized in applications to air emissions but, with a very few exceptions, not to water quality protection. Yet substantial interest in water quality trading remains. We explore the economic literature on water quality trading, focusing on class of trades generating the most interest: trades between point sources and agricultural nonpoint sources, or PS-NPS trading. We describe how NPS pollution processes and institutional environments create unique market design challenges, prompting the development of a specialized literature. The principal challenges stem from NPS emissions being unobservable and stochastic, preventing actual NPS emissions from serving the traditional role of a quantifiable, tradeable property right. Additionally, PS-NPS trading programs generally operate in complex institutional environments that limit the ability to regulate agricultural sources and also include pre-existing environmental policies. We describe that, while the integration of PS and NPS control efforts under PS-NPS markets has the potential to improve the overall efficiency of pollution control, good market design is key to realizing these gains. Well-designed markets will incentivize trades so that cost-reducing abatement reallocations do occur, with these trades either reducing or not substantially increasing environmental risks brought about by NPS uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Economics and Policy
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x2530004x
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review Paper — Economics and Policy of Point-Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Trading Programs

James S. Shortle, Carson Reeling, Richard D. Horan
Water Economics and Policy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Review Paper — Economics and Policy of Point-Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Trading Programs

James S. Shortle, Carson Reeling, Richard D. Horan
article en

Abstract

Pollution permit trading is of interest due to its potential to meet pollution control targets at minimum cost without market designers knowing polluters’ abatement costs. This potential has been substantially realized in applications to air emissions but, with a very few exceptions, not to water quality protection. Yet substantial interest in water quality trading remains. We explore the economic literature on water quality trading, focusing on class of trades generating the most interest: trades between point sources and agricultural nonpoint sources, or PS-NPS trading. We describe how NPS pollution processes and institutional environments create unique market design challenges, prompting the development of a specialized literature. The principal challenges stem from NPS emissions being unobservable and stochastic, preventing actual NPS emissions from serving the traditional role of a quantifiable, tradeable property right. Additionally, PS-NPS trading programs generally operate in complex institutional environments that limit the ability to regulate agricultural sources and also include pre-existing environmental policies. We describe that, while the integration of PS and NPS control efforts under PS-NPS markets has the potential to improve the overall efficiency of pollution control, good market design is key to realizing these gains. Well-designed markets will incentivize trades so that cost-reducing abatement reallocations do occur, with these trades either reducing or not substantially increasing environmental risks brought about by NPS uncertainties.

Water Economics and PolicyVol. 11(04)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Michigan State University (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.