One System, Two Rules: Asymmetrical Coupling of Speech Production and Reading Comprehension in the Trilingual Brain
<b>Background/Objectives:</b> The functional architecture connecting speech production and reading comprehension remains unclear in multilinguals. This study investigated the cross-modal interaction between these systems in trilinguals to resolve the debate between Age of Acquisition (AoA) and usage frequency. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited 144 Uyghur (L1)-Chinese (L2)-English (L3) trilinguals, a population uniquely dissociating acquisition order from social dominance. Participants completed a production-to-comprehension priming paradigm, naming pictures in one language before performing a lexical decision task on translated words. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. <b>Results:</b> Significant cross-language priming confirmed an integrated lexicon, yet a fundamental asymmetry emerged. The top-down influence of production was governed by AoA; earlier-acquired languages (specifically L1) generated more effective priming signals than L2. Conversely, the bottom-up efficiency of recognition was driven by social usage frequency; the socially dominant L2 was the most receptive target, surpassing the heritage L1. <b>Conclusions:</b> The trilingual lexicon operates via "Two Rules": a history-driven production system (AoA) and an environment-driven recognition system (Social Usage). This asymmetrical baseline challenges simple bilingual extensions and clarifies the dynamics of multilingual language control.
Authors
- Yuanbo Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0426-363X)
- Qiuyue Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6162-2992)
- Yingfang Meng
- Ruiming Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-5813)
Institutions
- Fujian Normal University (CN)
- Anshan Normal University (CN)
- Ministry of Education (RW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Brain Sciences
- Published
- 2025-11-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15121288
- Primary Topic
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00