Reading from Single Versus Multiple Displays: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Comparison

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Mastery of reading requires the ability to process multiple stimuli in sequence. Previous research shows that children gradually develop this skill as their reading experience increases. This study investigated the serial superiority effect and its association with reading experience. Reading performance was compared using single- and multiple-word displays in typically developing Italian readers from 1st to 3rd grade. Given the link between reading times and interindividual variability, the analyses used models (DEM, RAM, and State trace) that account for global components of individual performance. <b>Methods</b>: Ninety 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-grade students participated. Children were presented with words of varying lengths. Stimuli appeared either sequentially from left to right (single-display condition) or in a static array of 25 words (multiple-display condition). <b>Results</b>: Reading times were faster in the multiple-display than the single-display condition, as expected. Analyses of global components showed that this advantage increased linearly with years of schooling. This finding reflects a progressive mastery of multiple displays as the reading experience grew. <b>Conclusions</b>: Global processing models effectively capture early reading acquisition, especially the increasing difference between reading from single displays and managing multiple reading stimuli.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15121284
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading from Single Versus Multiple Displays: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Comparison

Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Marialuisa Martelli, Sara Conforti, Pierluigi Zoccolotti
Brain Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Reading from Single Versus Multiple Displays: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Comparison

Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Marialuisa Martelli, Sara Conforti, Pierluigi Zoccolotti
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Mastery of reading requires the ability to process multiple stimuli in sequence. Previous research shows that children gradually develop this skill as their reading experience increases. This study investigated the serial superiority effect and its association with reading experience. Reading performance was compared using single- and multiple-word displays in typically developing Italian readers from 1st to 3rd grade. Given the link between reading times and interindividual variability, the analyses used models (DEM, RAM, and State trace) that account for global components of individual performance. <b>Methods</b>: Ninety 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-grade students participated. Children were presented with words of varying lengths. Stimuli appeared either sequentially from left to right (single-display condition) or in a static array of 25 words (multiple-display condition). <b>Results</b>: Reading times were faster in the multiple-display than the single-display condition, as expected. Analyses of global components showed that this advantage increased linearly with years of schooling. This finding reflects a progressive mastery of multiple displays as the reading experience grew. <b>Conclusions</b>: Global processing models effectively capture early reading acquisition, especially the increasing difference between reading from single displays and managing multiple reading stimuli.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(12)
University of Foggia (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Università degli Studi di Foggia, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading from Single Versus Multiple Displays: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Comparison — Chiara Valeria Marinelli, Marialuisa Martelli, et al. · Brain Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS