Accuracy of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms in Facial Asymmetry Evaluation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orthodontic Patients

Introduction: Facial asymmetry significantly influences orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient satisfaction. Although three-dimensional imaging techniques such as CBCT provide comprehensive diagnostic information, their routine use is often restricted due to higher costs and radiation exposure. As a result, two-dimensional imaging modalities—primarily orthopantomograms (OPG) and lateral cephalograms (LC)—remain widely used in clinical practice. Aim & Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the diagnostic reliability of OPG and LC in assessing skeletal facial asymmetry, focusing on linear and angular skeletal parameters measurable on both. Materials & Methods: Standardized protocols ensured consistent patient positioning to reduce distortion. Results: indicated that lateral cephalograms were more accurate in detecting midline deviations and angular skeletal discrepancies, particularly in the anteroposterior and vertical planes. On the other hand, OPGs demonstrated reasonable diagnostic utility in identifying vertical asymmetries, such as differences in ramus height, provided patient positioning was meticulously controlled. Conclusion: The study concludes that while LC is superior overall, both modalities can serve complementary roles in routine orthodontic assessment

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2025.406562.1150
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms in Facial Asymmetry Evaluation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orthodontic Patients

P. Revathi, Surya Teja, P Saravanan, D Aruna et al.
Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Accuracy of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms in Facial Asymmetry Evaluation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orthodontic Patients

P. Revathi, Surya Teja, P Saravanan, D Aruna, L Devikanth, Agatheeswaran T Agatheeswaran T, Sanjeev Jakati
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Facial asymmetry significantly influences orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient satisfaction. Although three-dimensional imaging techniques such as CBCT provide comprehensive diagnostic information, their routine use is often restricted due to higher costs and radiation exposure. As a result, two-dimensional imaging modalities—primarily orthopantomograms (OPG) and lateral cephalograms (LC)—remain widely used in clinical practice. Aim & Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the diagnostic reliability of OPG and LC in assessing skeletal facial asymmetry, focusing on linear and angular skeletal parameters measurable on both. Materials & Methods: Standardized protocols ensured consistent patient positioning to reduce distortion. Results: indicated that lateral cephalograms were more accurate in detecting midline deviations and angular skeletal discrepancies, particularly in the anteroposterior and vertical planes. On the other hand, OPGs demonstrated reasonable diagnostic utility in identifying vertical asymmetries, such as differences in ramus height, provided patient positioning was meticulously controlled. Conclusion: The study concludes that while LC is superior overall, both modalities can serve complementary roles in routine orthodontic assessment

Egyptian Orthodontic JournalVol. 68(1)
Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms in Facial Asymmetry Evaluation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orthodontic Patients — P. Revathi, Surya Teja, et al. · Egyptian Orthodontic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS