Comparison of the mechanical properties of direct printed versus thermoformed aligners

Introduction: Clear aligners have emerged as a popular alternative to traditional braces, offering improved aesthetics and comfort. Aligners can be grouped according to the materials used or mode of fabrication, which can influence the mechanical properties of the aligner. The aim of this research: is to compare the mechanical properties of two different aligner materials fabricated by direct printing (DPA) versus two different aligner materials fabricated by thermoforming (-TFA).Materials and methods: Four materials were utilized to fabricate bar-shaped aligner specimens using two fabrication techniques: TFA and DPA. For the TFA, Zendura FLX and Duran+ were selected, while Dental LT Clear by and Tera Harz TC-85DAC were used for the DPA. Testing was conducted using a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) to determine the tensile strength and calculate the elastic modulus. Additionally, a contact profilometer was employed to assess the surface roughness of the specimens. Results: No significant differences were observed in elastic modulus (MPa) (F = 1.14, p = 0.34). However, tensile strength (MPa) differed among the materials (F = 27.92, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed that DPA exhibited higher stress values compared to TFA (p < 0.001). TC-85DAC showed the highest tensile strength of 25.87 MPa, followed by Dental LT Clear 25.38 MPa. Zendura FLX had the lowest tensile strength . Surface roughness of the DPA had a higher value.Conclusion: DPA exhibit superior mechanical strength. However, their increased surface roughness can influence plaque accumulation, wear patterns, and comfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2025.396470.1144
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the mechanical properties of direct printed versus thermoformed aligners

Mohamed Mowafy, Tommaso Castroflorio, Abbas Zaher, Hassan A Al-hamdy
Egyptian Orthodontic Journal
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Comparison of the mechanical properties of direct printed versus thermoformed aligners

Mohamed Mowafy, Tommaso Castroflorio, Abbas Zaher, Hassan A Al-hamdy
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clear aligners have emerged as a popular alternative to traditional braces, offering improved aesthetics and comfort. Aligners can be grouped according to the materials used or mode of fabrication, which can influence the mechanical properties of the aligner. The aim of this research: is to compare the mechanical properties of two different aligner materials fabricated by direct printing (DPA) versus two different aligner materials fabricated by thermoforming (-TFA).Materials and methods: Four materials were utilized to fabricate bar-shaped aligner specimens using two fabrication techniques: TFA and DPA. For the TFA, Zendura FLX and Duran+ were selected, while Dental LT Clear by and Tera Harz TC-85DAC were used for the DPA. Testing was conducted using a Universal Testing Machine (UTM) to determine the tensile strength and calculate the elastic modulus. Additionally, a contact profilometer was employed to assess the surface roughness of the specimens. Results: No significant differences were observed in elastic modulus (MPa) (F = 1.14, p = 0.34). However, tensile strength (MPa) differed among the materials (F = 27.92, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed that DPA exhibited higher stress values compared to TFA (p < 0.001). TC-85DAC showed the highest tensile strength of 25.87 MPa, followed by Dental LT Clear 25.38 MPa. Zendura FLX had the lowest tensile strength . Surface roughness of the DPA had a higher value.Conclusion: DPA exhibit superior mechanical strength. However, their increased surface roughness can influence plaque accumulation, wear patterns, and comfort.

Egyptian Orthodontic JournalVol. 68(1)
University of Genoa (IT), Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.