Connecting the dots between blue economic development and coastal community development using a seaweed case study in Madura, Indonesia

Abstract The benefits of blue economic development and coastal community development are often conflicting, as many blue economic development project holders are non-local investors and decisions on such projects tend to insufficiently involve communities. The research objective is to analyse the requirements for such interlinkages and to design, test and validate under which circumstances and for which particular products or services this is sufficiently feasible. We call for a novel research agenda which connects divergent claims and benefits. This paper employs Resource Dependency Theory to establish a framework and conduct a purposeful and context-specific literature review of documented cases in ASEAN countries, given the large number of rural coastal communities and the current blue economy policies and projects in this specific region. The first review identifies specific requirements and factors that contribute to or hinder blue economic development and coastal community development. The analysis then focuses on one or more specific case studies/case areas in Madura, Indonesia (or other locations). Hereby, we examined specific development factors, relying on statistics and socio-economic development indicators. The study demonstrates that the lack of coordination across sectoral policies (both at local and central levels) has exacerbated conflicts between communities, seaweed farmers, private enterprises and governments at both local and central levels. These conflicts demonstrate that the blue economy’s rhetoric of inclusive development is not aligned with the practical realities faced by small-scale producers. Moreover, the competition between seaweed farming, fish farming, tourism, and industrial development undermines the ability of small-scale actors to access and utilise marine resources securely. Policies that empower small-scale producers, strengthen local institutions, and promote cross-sectoral coordination would create more effective and sustainable blue economy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02264-9
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting the dots between blue economic development and coastal community development using a seaweed case study in Madura, Indonesia

Walter Timo de Vries, Dwi Ratna Hidayati
Discover Sustainability
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Connecting the dots between blue economic development and coastal community development using a seaweed case study in Madura, Indonesia

Walter Timo de Vries, Dwi Ratna Hidayati
article en

Abstract

Abstract The benefits of blue economic development and coastal community development are often conflicting, as many blue economic development project holders are non-local investors and decisions on such projects tend to insufficiently involve communities. The research objective is to analyse the requirements for such interlinkages and to design, test and validate under which circumstances and for which particular products or services this is sufficiently feasible. We call for a novel research agenda which connects divergent claims and benefits. This paper employs Resource Dependency Theory to establish a framework and conduct a purposeful and context-specific literature review of documented cases in ASEAN countries, given the large number of rural coastal communities and the current blue economy policies and projects in this specific region. The first review identifies specific requirements and factors that contribute to or hinder blue economic development and coastal community development. The analysis then focuses on one or more specific case studies/case areas in Madura, Indonesia (or other locations). Hereby, we examined specific development factors, relying on statistics and socio-economic development indicators. The study demonstrates that the lack of coordination across sectoral policies (both at local and central levels) has exacerbated conflicts between communities, seaweed farmers, private enterprises and governments at both local and central levels. These conflicts demonstrate that the blue economy’s rhetoric of inclusive development is not aligned with the practical realities faced by small-scale producers. Moreover, the competition between seaweed farming, fish farming, tourism, and industrial development undermines the ability of small-scale actors to access and utilise marine resources securely. Policies that empower small-scale producers, strengthen local institutions, and promote cross-sectoral coordination would create more effective and sustainable blue economy development.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura (ID), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.