A New Method for Determining the Ecological Flow Regime to Support Sustainable Restoration of Target Fish Habitats in Impaired Rivers

Large-scale river degradation constitutes a global challenge, rendering the ecological restoration of impaired rivers ever more crucial. While ecological restoration projects have enhanced the quality of river habitats, given the dynamic nature and complexity of river and lake ecosystems, the achievement of sustainable restoration of fish habitats and the assurance of its effectiveness continue to face numerous challenges. Consequently, this study proposes an improved approach to determine the ecological flow requirements of fish habitats in impaired rivers. In relation to the screening of key species, a bespoke evaluation index system has been developed specifically for impaired rivers lacking rare and endemic fish species. Primary data were collected via field surveys, ecological monitoring, and a review of the literature, while the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to quantitatively identify key species. In the development of the assessment framework, three core indicators were integrated: habitat-weighted usable area (WUA), habitat connectivity index (HCI), and microhabitat heterogeneity index (RMH). Incorporating the ecological requirements of key fish species across different life stages, a systematic analysis was undertaken to explore the ecological response effects of different indicator combinations under varying flow regimes. The results revealed that a flow rate of 160 m3/s gives rise to an inflection point in the RMH diversity index at 1.618, whereas a flow rate of 240 m3/s results in a significant inflection point in the HCI at 0.652. At a flow rate of 260 m3/s, the WUA attains 2,007,928 m2. The optimal ecological flow range was determined to be 160–240 m3/s for the breeding period (March–June), 240–260 m3/s for the foraging period (July–October), and 120 m3/s for the winter period. These findings provide a theoretical framework for the restoration of target fish populations in similarly degraded rivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310703
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Method for Determining the Ecological Flow Regime to Support Sustainable Restoration of Target Fish Habitats in Impaired Rivers

Yang Ding, Zheng Zhou, Jing Zhang, Zhe Liu et al.
Sustainability
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

A New Method for Determining the Ecological Flow Regime to Support Sustainable Restoration of Target Fish Habitats in Impaired Rivers

Yang Ding, Zheng Zhou, Jing Zhang, Zhe Liu, Zicheng Yu, Jinyong Zhao
article en

Abstract

Large-scale river degradation constitutes a global challenge, rendering the ecological restoration of impaired rivers ever more crucial. While ecological restoration projects have enhanced the quality of river habitats, given the dynamic nature and complexity of river and lake ecosystems, the achievement of sustainable restoration of fish habitats and the assurance of its effectiveness continue to face numerous challenges. Consequently, this study proposes an improved approach to determine the ecological flow requirements of fish habitats in impaired rivers. In relation to the screening of key species, a bespoke evaluation index system has been developed specifically for impaired rivers lacking rare and endemic fish species. Primary data were collected via field surveys, ecological monitoring, and a review of the literature, while the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to quantitatively identify key species. In the development of the assessment framework, three core indicators were integrated: habitat-weighted usable area (WUA), habitat connectivity index (HCI), and microhabitat heterogeneity index (RMH). Incorporating the ecological requirements of key fish species across different life stages, a systematic analysis was undertaken to explore the ecological response effects of different indicator combinations under varying flow regimes. The results revealed that a flow rate of 160 m3/s gives rise to an inflection point in the RMH diversity index at 1.618, whereas a flow rate of 240 m3/s results in a significant inflection point in the HCI at 0.652. At a flow rate of 260 m3/s, the WUA attains 2,007,928 m2. The optimal ecological flow range was determined to be 160–240 m3/s for the breeding period (March–June), 240–260 m3/s for the foraging period (July–October), and 120 m3/s for the winter period. These findings provide a theoretical framework for the restoration of target fish populations in similarly degraded rivers.

SustainabilityVol. 17(23)
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Ningxia Water Conservancy (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.