After-visit and discharge summaries: a scoping review of stakeholder perspectives and experiences

After-Visit Summary (AVS) and Discharge Summary (DS) are essential tools for patient-centered care, aiming to improve communication, enhance engagement, and provide clear, actionable health information. While AVS and DS have been studied in various contexts, no scoping review has systematically explored their usage, perceptions, and outcomes from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Despite their potential, challenges such as usability issues, design variability, and technological constraints often limit their effectiveness. By mapping existing evidence, this review aims to explore usage, attitudes, and outcomes of AVS and DS from the stakeholders’ perspectives, identifying critical barriers and facilitators, and highlighting areas for improvement to guide future implementation and optimization of these tools. The scoping review was conducted following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, with additional screening of reference lists. Studies involving patients, caregivers, or healthcare providers and examining AVS and DS implementation in any healthcare setting were included. Seventy-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA (47.9%), utilized quantitative methods (54.8%) and focused on DS implementation (71.2%). Key findings showed that AVS and DS improve communication, patient engagement, and care transitions. Patients appreciated clear and concise summaries, while healthcare providers identified challenges with workflow integration and time constraints. Barriers included technical language, inconsistent formatting, and limited EHR integration. Facilitators such as simplified language, tailored content, and stakeholder involvement improved usability and effectiveness. Outcomes reported included better patient understanding of their condition, improved adherence to medical advice and treatment plans, and enhanced care continuity during transitions. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of stakeholder perspective on AVS and DS. While these tools are essential for enhancing communication and empowering patients, their efficacy hinges on overcoming challenges related to usability and standardization. By identifying key barriers and opportunities, our findings offer a foundation for refining AVS and DS through stakeholder-driven design, policy development, and technological advancements. Participatory design, research advancements, and technology integration are key to enhancing their usability and impact across healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13774-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

After-visit and discharge summaries: a scoping review of stakeholder perspectives and experiences

Sarah Bigi, Serena Barello, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Michela Monaci
1 citations
BMC Health Services Research
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
article

After-visit and discharge summaries: a scoping review of stakeholder perspectives and experiences

Sarah Bigi, Serena Barello, Mateus Eduardo Romão, Michela Monaci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

After-Visit Summary (AVS) and Discharge Summary (DS) are essential tools for patient-centered care, aiming to improve communication, enhance engagement, and provide clear, actionable health information. While AVS and DS have been studied in various contexts, no scoping review has systematically explored their usage, perceptions, and outcomes from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Despite their potential, challenges such as usability issues, design variability, and technological constraints often limit their effectiveness. By mapping existing evidence, this review aims to explore usage, attitudes, and outcomes of AVS and DS from the stakeholders’ perspectives, identifying critical barriers and facilitators, and highlighting areas for improvement to guide future implementation and optimization of these tools. The scoping review was conducted following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, with additional screening of reference lists. Studies involving patients, caregivers, or healthcare providers and examining AVS and DS implementation in any healthcare setting were included. Seventy-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA (47.9%), utilized quantitative methods (54.8%) and focused on DS implementation (71.2%). Key findings showed that AVS and DS improve communication, patient engagement, and care transitions. Patients appreciated clear and concise summaries, while healthcare providers identified challenges with workflow integration and time constraints. Barriers included technical language, inconsistent formatting, and limited EHR integration. Facilitators such as simplified language, tailored content, and stakeholder involvement improved usability and effectiveness. Outcomes reported included better patient understanding of their condition, improved adherence to medical advice and treatment plans, and enhanced care continuity during transitions. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of stakeholder perspective on AVS and DS. While these tools are essential for enhancing communication and empowering patients, their efficacy hinges on overcoming challenges related to usability and standardization. By identifying key barriers and opportunities, our findings offer a foundation for refining AVS and DS through stakeholder-driven design, policy development, and technological advancements. Participatory design, research advancements, and technology integration are key to enhancing their usability and impact across healthcare settings.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.