The ethics of analog AI

Abstract AI ethics has matured as a field, yet its concepts and tools have been developed almost entirely with digital AI in mind. Emerging “analog” AI approaches, that is, systems that compute over continuous, rather than binary, signals, challenge this digital default. Analog AI promises substantial energy savings and alternative modes of information processing. However, it also departs in ethically significant ways from the widely discussed digital AI systems such that its differences from digital AI could mean that current ethical frameworks may not address analog AI’s unique challenges. This paper highlights how the distinctive characteristics of analog AI raise new ethical questions that require careful consideration. We examine four key areas of AI ethics, namely fairness, privacy, explainability, and safety, and propose a roadmap for the ethical examination of analog AI. Our aim is to lay the foundation for an important but hitherto unrecognized subfield within AI ethics: the ethics of analog AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00884-5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of analog AI

Sven Nyholm, Gitta Kutyniok, Maximilian Kiener, Jonas Bozenhard
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The ethics of analog AI

Sven Nyholm, Gitta Kutyniok, Maximilian Kiener, Jonas Bozenhard
article en

Abstract

Abstract AI ethics has matured as a field, yet its concepts and tools have been developed almost entirely with digital AI in mind. Emerging “analog” AI approaches, that is, systems that compute over continuous, rather than binary, signals, challenge this digital default. Analog AI promises substantial energy savings and alternative modes of information processing. However, it also departs in ethically significant ways from the widely discussed digital AI systems such that its differences from digital AI could mean that current ethical frameworks may not address analog AI’s unique challenges. This paper highlights how the distinctive characteristics of analog AI raise new ethical questions that require careful consideration. We examine four key areas of AI ethics, namely fairness, privacy, explainability, and safety, and propose a roadmap for the ethical examination of analog AI. Our aim is to lay the foundation for an important but hitherto unrecognized subfield within AI ethics: the ethics of analog AI.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE), Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ethics of analog AI — Sven Nyholm, Gitta Kutyniok, et al. · AI and Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS