A framework for ethical AI-HRM development and use

Abstract Our work addresses the challenge of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into human resource management (HRM) systems while minimizing bias, increasing transparency, and ensuring accountability. We examine how developers and adopters of AI-HRM systems can proactively identify and mitigate bias while adhering to U.S. anti-discrimination laws. In this paper, we propose a framework for the evaluation of equity and transparency in AI-HRM systems developed through an analysis of U.S. laws related to discrimination and a parallel examination of established ethical frameworks for AI. Our work reveals shortcomings in the transparency and equity of existing AI-HRM systems, highlighting the pervasive nature of potential biases and the ambiguity surrounding accountability. These findings underscore the need for a structured approach to bias evaluation, directly supporting the necessity and value of the proposed bias audit benchmark as a tool for ensuring responsible AI adoption in HRM. While prior works highlight technical obstacles in developing bias-free AI-powered systems, they fail to provide technical solutions that incorporate legal and ethical ramifications. Our work bridges the gap by explicitly addressing issues of AI bias within HRM systems from technical, legal, and ethical perspectives. In particular, we synthesize the “siloed” approach of these different areas of work into a unified path forward grounded in existing theoretical principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00858-7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for ethical AI-HRM development and use

Ankur Gupta, Hilary G. Buttrick, Jean E. Davidson, Jerry Schnepp
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A framework for ethical AI-HRM development and use

Ankur Gupta, Hilary G. Buttrick, Jean E. Davidson, Jerry Schnepp
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our work addresses the challenge of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into human resource management (HRM) systems while minimizing bias, increasing transparency, and ensuring accountability. We examine how developers and adopters of AI-HRM systems can proactively identify and mitigate bias while adhering to U.S. anti-discrimination laws. In this paper, we propose a framework for the evaluation of equity and transparency in AI-HRM systems developed through an analysis of U.S. laws related to discrimination and a parallel examination of established ethical frameworks for AI. Our work reveals shortcomings in the transparency and equity of existing AI-HRM systems, highlighting the pervasive nature of potential biases and the ambiguity surrounding accountability. These findings underscore the need for a structured approach to bias evaluation, directly supporting the necessity and value of the proposed bias audit benchmark as a tool for ensuring responsible AI adoption in HRM. While prior works highlight technical obstacles in developing bias-free AI-powered systems, they fail to provide technical solutions that incorporate legal and ethical ramifications. Our work bridges the gap by explicitly addressing issues of AI bias within HRM systems from technical, legal, and ethical perspectives. In particular, we synthesize the “siloed” approach of these different areas of work into a unified path forward grounded in existing theoretical principles.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(1)
Roosevelt University (US), Butler University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.