Where Is Gender in the Historiography of LGBTQ+ College Students?

Abstract This forum contribution considers the complexities and importance of gender in the historiography of LGBTQ+ college students. After a brief introduction, we focus on four key areas in the existing historiography: women’s romantic relationships in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, higher education leaders’ enforcement of gender norms and purges of LGBTQ+ students through the mid-twentieth century, the gender dynamics within LGBTQ+ student organizations from the 1970s onward, and trans and other LGBTQ+ students’ expansion of gender possibilities, including through the use of drag. In so doing, we argue that gender analysis is important to the historiography of LGBTQ+ students, though most often that analysis has been implicit rather than explicit. Considering both the gaps in our historical knowledge and the rising attacks on LGBTQ+ individuals, we contend that continued gendered analyses are not only warranted but also needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Education Quarterly
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2025.10115
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Is Gender in the Historiography of LGBTQ+ College Students?

Timothy Reese Cain, Michael S. Hevel
History of Education Quarterly
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

Where Is Gender in the Historiography of LGBTQ+ College Students?

Timothy Reese Cain, Michael S. Hevel
article en

Abstract

Abstract This forum contribution considers the complexities and importance of gender in the historiography of LGBTQ+ college students. After a brief introduction, we focus on four key areas in the existing historiography: women’s romantic relationships in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, higher education leaders’ enforcement of gender norms and purges of LGBTQ+ students through the mid-twentieth century, the gender dynamics within LGBTQ+ student organizations from the 1970s onward, and trans and other LGBTQ+ students’ expansion of gender possibilities, including through the use of drag. In so doing, we argue that gender analysis is important to the historiography of LGBTQ+ students, though most often that analysis has been implicit rather than explicit. Considering both the gaps in our historical knowledge and the rising attacks on LGBTQ+ individuals, we contend that continued gendered analyses are not only warranted but also needed.

History of Education QuarterlyVol. 66(1)
University of Georgia (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where Is Gender in the Historiography of LGBTQ+ College Students? — Timothy Reese Cain, Michael S. Hevel · History of Education Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS