Predicting and correcting the influence of boundary conditions in regional inverse analyses

Abstract. Regional inverse analyses of atmospheric trace gas observations quantify gridded two-dimensional surface fluxes by fitting the observations to simulated concentrations from a transport model, usually by Bayesian optimization regularized by a gridded prior flux estimate. Regional inversions rely on the specification of background concentrations given by the boundary conditions (BCs) at the edges of the inversion domain, but biases in the BCs propagate to biases in the optimized fluxes. We develop a theoretical framework to explain how errors in the BCs influence the optimized fluxes as a function of the prior and observing system error statistics and of model transport. We derive a preview metric to estimate the BC-induced errors before conducting an inversion to support domain specification and a diagnostic metric to accurately quantify these errors after solving the inversion. We compare two methods to correct BC biases as part of an inversion, either directly by optimizing BC concentrations (boundary method) or indirectly by expanding the domain and correcting grid cell fluxes outside the region of interest (buffer method). We demonstrate that the boundary method is generally more accurate, physically grounded, and computationally tractable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9279-2025
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting and correcting the influence of boundary conditions in regional inverse analyses

Cynthia A. Randles, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Felipe J. Cardoso‐Saldaña, D. J. Jacob et al.
Geoscientific model development
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Predicting and correcting the influence of boundary conditions in regional inverse analyses

Cynthia A. Randles, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Felipe J. Cardoso‐Saldaña, D. J. Jacob, K. W. Bowman, Hannah Nesser, Ashutosh Tewari, Daniel J. Varon, Matthew D. Thill, Emily Reidy
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Regional inverse analyses of atmospheric trace gas observations quantify gridded two-dimensional surface fluxes by fitting the observations to simulated concentrations from a transport model, usually by Bayesian optimization regularized by a gridded prior flux estimate. Regional inversions rely on the specification of background concentrations given by the boundary conditions (BCs) at the edges of the inversion domain, but biases in the BCs propagate to biases in the optimized fluxes. We develop a theoretical framework to explain how errors in the BCs influence the optimized fluxes as a function of the prior and observing system error statistics and of model transport. We derive a preview metric to estimate the BC-induced errors before conducting an inversion to support domain specification and a diagnostic metric to accurately quantify these errors after solving the inversion. We compare two methods to correct BC biases as part of an inversion, either directly by optimizing BC concentrations (boundary method) or indirectly by expanding the domain and correcting grid cell fluxes outside the region of interest (buffer method). We demonstrate that the boundary method is generally more accurate, physically grounded, and computationally tractable.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(23)
Amazon (United States) (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Harvard University (US), University of South Carolina Sumter (US), Clean Air Task Force (US), Space Research Organisation Netherlands (NL), ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.