Enhancing the effectiveness of satellite precipitation products with topographic and seasonal bias correction

• This study assesses the bias correction in satellite-based precipitation data. • A novel method (HRPA) is introduced to evaluate the nonlinear errors in precipitation. • HRPA outperforms SARIMA at both lower and higher elevation areas. • Autocorrelation in time lag shows systematic influences of past residuals on future data. Estimating precipitation distribution across large regions is crucial for understanding water availability, planning infrastructure, and forecasting flood hazards. Traditional gauge-based methods face challenges, particularly with sparse gauge networks. In response, satellite-based, near-real-time (NRT) precipitation data has gained popularity, especially in poorly gauged watersheds. However, satellite precipitation data quality is often compromised by latency, atmospheric complexities, and topographic effects, resulting in nonlinear errors. To overcome the research gap, this study introduces the Heavy Rain Peak Adjustment (HRPA) method alongside the well-established Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model for satellite precipitation bias correction. The analysis utilised Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP-NRT) data and hourly precipitation records from 31 rain gauges in the Ovens River region of Australia. On average, the mean residual of observed and GSMaP-NRT precipitation was −0.02 mm. Additionally, the HRPA method yielded better linear regression R 2 (0.911), NSE (log) (−0.847), and RMSE (0.628) compared to SARIMA. The results indicate that HRPA outperforms SARIMA, particularly at lower elevations, whereas SARIMA struggles at higher elevations, underscoring its limitations in those areas. Additionally, autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots for some stations in hilly areas show significant wave-like patterns, indicating greater uncertainty in satellite precipitation estimates over complex terrain. For several stations, autocorrelations at 24 and 48-hour lags suggest a systematic influence of past residuals on future ones, emphasizing the need for further refinement in satellite precipitation correction methods for these regions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134688
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the effectiveness of satellite precipitation products with topographic and seasonal bias correction

Susantha Wanniarachchi, Upaka Rathnayake, Pattiyage I. A. Gomes, Ranjan Sarukkalige et al.
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
article

Enhancing the effectiveness of satellite precipitation products with topographic and seasonal bias correction

Susantha Wanniarachchi, Upaka Rathnayake, Pattiyage I. A. Gomes, Ranjan Sarukkalige, Hapu Arachchige Prasantha Hapuarachchi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• This study assesses the bias correction in satellite-based precipitation data. • A novel method (HRPA) is introduced to evaluate the nonlinear errors in precipitation. • HRPA outperforms SARIMA at both lower and higher elevation areas. • Autocorrelation in time lag shows systematic influences of past residuals on future data. Estimating precipitation distribution across large regions is crucial for understanding water availability, planning infrastructure, and forecasting flood hazards. Traditional gauge-based methods face challenges, particularly with sparse gauge networks. In response, satellite-based, near-real-time (NRT) precipitation data has gained popularity, especially in poorly gauged watersheds. However, satellite precipitation data quality is often compromised by latency, atmospheric complexities, and topographic effects, resulting in nonlinear errors. To overcome the research gap, this study introduces the Heavy Rain Peak Adjustment (HRPA) method alongside the well-established Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model for satellite precipitation bias correction. The analysis utilised Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP-NRT) data and hourly precipitation records from 31 rain gauges in the Ovens River region of Australia. On average, the mean residual of observed and GSMaP-NRT precipitation was −0.02 mm. Additionally, the HRPA method yielded better linear regression R 2 (0.911), NSE (log) (−0.847), and RMSE (0.628) compared to SARIMA. The results indicate that HRPA outperforms SARIMA, particularly at lower elevations, whereas SARIMA struggles at higher elevations, underscoring its limitations in those areas. Additionally, autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots for some stations in hilly areas show significant wave-like patterns, indicating greater uncertainty in satellite precipitation estimates over complex terrain. For several stations, autocorrelations at 24 and 48-hour lags suggest a systematic influence of past residuals on future ones, emphasizing the need for further refinement in satellite precipitation correction methods for these regions.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 665
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.