Rethinking local content requirements in EU public procurement within the paradigm of sustainable development

The European Union (EU) has traditionally opposed local content requirements (LCRs) in public procurement, viewing them as contrary to the principles of free trade and competition. However, recent global crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and supply chain disruptions, have prompted a reconsideration of these policies. This article explores how the concept of sustainable development, enshrined in EU law, provides a framework for justifying LCRs under specific conditions. By analysing EU case law and policy developments, the study argues that LCRs can be permissible if they serve broader strategic goals determined within the sustainable development paradigm, such as environmental protection and social welfare, rather than economic protectionism. Ultimately, the findings suggest that carefully designed LCRs can enhance economic resilience while remaining compatible with EU legal principles. It is, however, crucial to emphasize that LCRs may be permissible, provided that they are proportionate to the contracting authority’s objectively justified needs, assessed with due diligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2025.87.3.08
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking local content requirements in EU public procurement within the paradigm of sustainable development

Jarosław Kola
Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Rethinking local content requirements in EU public procurement within the paradigm of sustainable development

Jarosław Kola
article en

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has traditionally opposed local content requirements (LCRs) in public procurement, viewing them as contrary to the principles of free trade and competition. However, recent global crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and supply chain disruptions, have prompted a reconsideration of these policies. This article explores how the concept of sustainable development, enshrined in EU law, provides a framework for justifying LCRs under specific conditions. By analysing EU case law and policy developments, the study argues that LCRs can be permissible if they serve broader strategic goals determined within the sustainable development paradigm, such as environmental protection and social welfare, rather than economic protectionism. Ultimately, the findings suggest that carefully designed LCRs can enhance economic resilience while remaining compatible with EU legal principles. It is, however, crucial to emphasize that LCRs may be permissible, provided that they are proportionate to the contracting authority’s objectively justified needs, assessed with due diligence.

Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i SocjologicznyVol. 87(3)
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.