Beyond Neurodiversity Lite: Improving the Robustness of Neurodiversity Employment Programs

ABSTRACT The confluence of economic conditions and emerging evidence of the advantages of a neurodiverse workforce has sparked dozens of high‐profile neurodiversity employment programs. Despite some success, the impact of these initiatives pales in comparison to the scope of employment challenges facing neurodivergent job seekers. In this article, we argue that the limited impact of neurodiversity employment initiatives is a function of at least three key challenges: (1) an emphasis on the strengths of neurodivergent employees without a simultaneous focus on substantial organizational change; (2) unrecognized demands placed on neurodivergent employees to navigate their work and careers; and (3) a focus on prototypical forms of neurodiversity without considering intersectional identities and their implications for inclusion and belonging. Acknowledging these limitations, we build on the foundation of these programs and provide suggestions for fostering cultural changes aimed toward improving and broadening the impact of neurodiversity employment programs to create truly neuroinclusive organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70039
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Neurodiversity Lite: Improving the Robustness of Neurodiversity Employment Programs

Maira E. Ezerins, Lauren Simon, Timothy J. Vogus, Elizabeth H. Follmer
2 citations
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Diversity and Career in Medicine
7.73
article

Beyond Neurodiversity Lite: Improving the Robustness of Neurodiversity Employment Programs

Maira E. Ezerins, Lauren Simon, Timothy J. Vogus, Elizabeth H. Follmer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The confluence of economic conditions and emerging evidence of the advantages of a neurodiverse workforce has sparked dozens of high‐profile neurodiversity employment programs. Despite some success, the impact of these initiatives pales in comparison to the scope of employment challenges facing neurodivergent job seekers. In this article, we argue that the limited impact of neurodiversity employment initiatives is a function of at least three key challenges: (1) an emphasis on the strengths of neurodivergent employees without a simultaneous focus on substantial organizational change; (2) unrecognized demands placed on neurodivergent employees to navigate their work and careers; and (3) a focus on prototypical forms of neurodiversity without considering intersectional identities and their implications for inclusion and belonging. Acknowledging these limitations, we build on the foundation of these programs and provide suggestions for fostering cultural changes aimed toward improving and broadening the impact of neurodiversity employment programs to create truly neuroinclusive organizations.

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVol. 47(1)
University of Central Florida (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University of Washington Bothell (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.