Combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation using random forest modeling

Forensic anthropologists commonly estimate osteological sex using separate morphological and metric analyses, without integrating both data types into a single classification model. Combining data types into one model has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies for the skull. Therefore, the present study seeks to improve classification accuracies for the skull by combining morphological and metric variables using random forest (RF) modeling. The main objectives are (1) generate multiple RF models that incorporate various combinations of morphological and metric variables for estimating osteological sex from an unknown individual, (2) compare the performance of morphological, metric, and combined data RF models, and (3) compare the results of the RF models to current methods for osteological sex estimation of the skull. The sample included 212 European Americans (males = 106, females = 106) and 191 African Americans (males = 114, females = 77). The models were trained on 80% of the sample and tested using a 20% holdout sample. Multiple models were generated using morphological, metric, and combined variables. Across all model types, the skull and cranium models achieved higher accuracies compared to the mandible models. The morphological and combined models attained higher accuracies compared to the metric models. Additionally, the morphological and combined RF models attained comparable classification accuracies to current standard osteological sex estimation methods, as well as compared to previous studies that integrated skull measurements and traits. Future research should continue exploring RF modeling for osteological sex estimation, including models combining metric and morphological variables from multiple skeletal regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70241
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation using random forest modeling

John J. Schultz, Donovan M. Adams, Morgan Ferrell
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation using random forest modeling

John J. Schultz, Donovan M. Adams, Morgan Ferrell
article en

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists commonly estimate osteological sex using separate morphological and metric analyses, without integrating both data types into a single classification model. Combining data types into one model has the potential to increase sex classification accuracies for the skull. Therefore, the present study seeks to improve classification accuracies for the skull by combining morphological and metric variables using random forest (RF) modeling. The main objectives are (1) generate multiple RF models that incorporate various combinations of morphological and metric variables for estimating osteological sex from an unknown individual, (2) compare the performance of morphological, metric, and combined data RF models, and (3) compare the results of the RF models to current methods for osteological sex estimation of the skull. The sample included 212 European Americans (males = 106, females = 106) and 191 African Americans (males = 114, females = 77). The models were trained on 80% of the sample and tested using a 20% holdout sample. Multiple models were generated using morphological, metric, and combined variables. Across all model types, the skull and cranium models achieved higher accuracies compared to the mandible models. The morphological and combined models attained higher accuracies compared to the metric models. Additionally, the morphological and combined RF models attained comparable classification accuracies to current standard osteological sex estimation methods, as well as compared to previous studies that integrated skull measurements and traits. Future research should continue exploring RF modeling for osteological sex estimation, including models combining metric and morphological variables from multiple skeletal regions.

Journal of Forensic SciencesVol. 71(2)
University of Central Florida (US), University of Kentucky (US), National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.