A framework for analyzing wild turkey summer sighting data

Abstract Wildlife agencies collect data on productivity (e.g., proportion of hens with poults and number of poults per hen) of wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo ) to monitor population status and trends. However, sampling protocols to collect productivity data rely on opportunistic observations reported by wildlife agency personnel and the public and have changed over time and differed among agencies. A protocol to standardize data collection was adopted by most state wildlife agencies in 2019, but long‐term historical datasets exist that cannot be analyzed readily to make inferences about spatial and temporal patterns in wild turkey productivity. We developed statistical models to allow comparisons and model trends in productivity among and within states even though data collection protocols changed over time and differed among states. We found greater spatial variation in the proportion of hens with poults than the number of poults per brood, which may reflect how environmental factors influence wild turkey productivity. Our models can also provide inferences about productivity when data are limited or temporally discontinuous for some spatial units. Additionally, we found that temporal and spatial variation in data collection, even under the new protocol, can affect inferences about trends in productivity. The statistical models we developed address the uncontrolled nature of when and where data are collected and offer the ability to investigate long‐term patterns of productivity in relation to factors such as changing climate or habitat conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1623
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for analyzing wild turkey summer sighting data

Laura C. Gigliotti, James Sloan, Joshua C. Stiller, Duane R. Diefenbach et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
article

A framework for analyzing wild turkey summer sighting data

Laura C. Gigliotti, James Sloan, Joshua C. Stiller, Duane R. Diefenbach, Frances E. Buderman, Channen Long, Michael L. Peters, Katherine A. Martin, Michelle Dye, Mary Jo Casalena, Mark J. Wiley, Robert J. Gates, Michael S. Muthersbaugh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Wildlife agencies collect data on productivity (e.g., proportion of hens with poults and number of poults per hen) of wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo ) to monitor population status and trends. However, sampling protocols to collect productivity data rely on opportunistic observations reported by wildlife agency personnel and the public and have changed over time and differed among agencies. A protocol to standardize data collection was adopted by most state wildlife agencies in 2019, but long‐term historical datasets exist that cannot be analyzed readily to make inferences about spatial and temporal patterns in wild turkey productivity. We developed statistical models to allow comparisons and model trends in productivity among and within states even though data collection protocols changed over time and differed among states. We found greater spatial variation in the proportion of hens with poults than the number of poults per brood, which may reflect how environmental factors influence wild turkey productivity. Our models can also provide inferences about productivity when data are limited or temporally discontinuous for some spatial units. Additionally, we found that temporal and spatial variation in data collection, even under the new protocol, can affect inferences about trends in productivity. The statistical models we developed address the uncontrolled nature of when and where data are collected and offer the ability to investigate long‐term patterns of productivity in relation to factors such as changing climate or habitat conditions.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(S1)
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (US), Ohio Department of Natural Resources (US), United States Geological Survey (US), New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (US), Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Parks and Wildlife Service (AU), Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (US), West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (US), West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.