Measuring congruence between available and selected vegetation at wild turkey nest sites

Abstract Processes underlying nest‐site selection are often considered drivers influencing wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo ssp.) nest success. Thus, decisions by females to identify nest sites should govern all other components of reproductive habitat selection as female wild turkeys will be tied to nest locations for the duration of the reproductive period. Our objective was to determine if differential selection for vegetation characteristics was occurring on the first day of egg laying. We evaluated vegetation conditions at nest sites and travel paths used by 131 female wild turkeys, monitored across Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas, USA, on the first day of egg laying. We used 164 nesting attempts and measured vegetation at 37,976 locations along 492 movement paths. Average vegetation height at the nest site was met or exceeded at 61–71% of random points along travel paths, whereas visual obstruction was met or exceeded at 22–25% of random points along travel paths. We found no effect of visual obstruction on nest success (β = −0.004, SE = 0.004, P = 0.349). Our results indicate that vegetation conditions selected by wild turkeys at nest sites were generally available on the landscape transversed by female wild turkeys during nest‐site selection. Our results illustrate that adequate nesting conditions, as conventionally measured, may not be as limited across the landscape as previously assumed. We suggest that given the plasticity wild turkeys have in selection of nest sites, future research activities should reduce focus on nest‐site vegetation sampling and increase focus on how nest success may be affected by nesting female behavioral activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring congruence between available and selected vegetation at wild turkey nest sites

Nicholas W. Bakner, Michael J. Chamberlain, Cody Cedotal, Bret A. Collier et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
article

Measuring congruence between available and selected vegetation at wild turkey nest sites

Nicholas W. Bakner, Michael J. Chamberlain, Cody Cedotal, Bret A. Collier, Landon R. Schofield
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Processes underlying nest‐site selection are often considered drivers influencing wild turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo ssp.) nest success. Thus, decisions by females to identify nest sites should govern all other components of reproductive habitat selection as female wild turkeys will be tied to nest locations for the duration of the reproductive period. Our objective was to determine if differential selection for vegetation characteristics was occurring on the first day of egg laying. We evaluated vegetation conditions at nest sites and travel paths used by 131 female wild turkeys, monitored across Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas, USA, on the first day of egg laying. We used 164 nesting attempts and measured vegetation at 37,976 locations along 492 movement paths. Average vegetation height at the nest site was met or exceeded at 61–71% of random points along travel paths, whereas visual obstruction was met or exceeded at 22–25% of random points along travel paths. We found no effect of visual obstruction on nest success (β = −0.004, SE = 0.004, P = 0.349). Our results indicate that vegetation conditions selected by wild turkeys at nest sites were generally available on the landscape transversed by female wild turkeys during nest‐site selection. Our results illustrate that adequate nesting conditions, as conventionally measured, may not be as limited across the landscape as previously assumed. We suggest that given the plasticity wild turkeys have in selection of nest sites, future research activities should reduce focus on nest‐site vegetation sampling and increase focus on how nest success may be affected by nesting female behavioral activities.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(S1)
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (US), Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), University of Georgia (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Georgia, Louisiana State University, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.