Real‐World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System

In this study we analyzed 12 years of adverse events, (AE) data from the World Apheresis Association, (WAA) Registry specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We queried WAA Registry data, (2012-2023) on apheresis procedures performed exclusively on the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We categorized AEs by severity, (mild, moderate, and severe), and ordered them by year. We then analyzed and presented AEs associated with the following variables: diagnosis, procedure type, vascular access, and replacement fluid type, and causes of procedural interruption. We identified 51 567 apheresis procedures specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System within the data set. AE rates from 2012 to 2023 for mild, moderate, and severe were 1.43%, 2.81%, and 0.21%, respectively. Procedures associated with the lowest AE rates include red blood cell exchange and therapeutic plasma exchange. The most common mild and moderate AEs include tingling and hypotension and AEs related to vascular access. The highest rates of mild and moderate AEs were associated with cellular collections. The highest rate of severe AEs was associated with the use of 3.5% albumin as replacement fluid. Other variables impacting patient safety are identified. AE rates could not be compared to the median length of procedure since this time variable is not currently collected in the Registry. This is the first device-specific analysis of the WAA Registry data, bringing prior safety reporting into even sharper focus. Device-specific safety analysis like this will help practitioners better understand potential safety concerns associated with a commonly used apheresis device, including various separation modalities and accessories, thus supporting improved procedure management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.70079
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‐World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System

Aaron Haubner, Ana Maria Vasilache, Tanya Nadia Glatt, Ines Bojanić et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Real‐World Safety Data From the World Apheresis Association Registry for the Spectra Optia Apheresis System

Aaron Haubner, Ana Maria Vasilache, Tanya Nadia Glatt, Ines Bojanić, Virginia Strineholm, Astrid Aandahl, Elizabeth Newman, Dries Deeren, Bernd Stegmayr, Zdeňka Gašová, Hans Vrielink, Volker Witt, Stanley A. Mendoza, Yona Skosana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study we analyzed 12 years of adverse events, (AE) data from the World Apheresis Association, (WAA) Registry specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We queried WAA Registry data, (2012-2023) on apheresis procedures performed exclusively on the Spectra Optia Apheresis System. We categorized AEs by severity, (mild, moderate, and severe), and ordered them by year. We then analyzed and presented AEs associated with the following variables: diagnosis, procedure type, vascular access, and replacement fluid type, and causes of procedural interruption. We identified 51 567 apheresis procedures specific to the Spectra Optia Apheresis System within the data set. AE rates from 2012 to 2023 for mild, moderate, and severe were 1.43%, 2.81%, and 0.21%, respectively. Procedures associated with the lowest AE rates include red blood cell exchange and therapeutic plasma exchange. The most common mild and moderate AEs include tingling and hypotension and AEs related to vascular access. The highest rates of mild and moderate AEs were associated with cellular collections. The highest rate of severe AEs was associated with the use of 3.5% albumin as replacement fluid. Other variables impacting patient safety are identified. AE rates could not be compared to the median length of procedure since this time variable is not currently collected in the Registry. This is the first device-specific analysis of the WAA Registry data, bringing prior safety reporting into even sharper focus. Device-specific safety analysis like this will help practitioners better understand potential safety concerns associated with a commonly used apheresis device, including various separation modalities and accessories, thus supporting improved procedure management.

Journal of Clinical ApheresisVol. 40(6)
Linköping University (SE), University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), University of Zagreb (HR), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Sanquin (NL), South African National Blood Service (ZA), Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion (CZ), University Hospital of Umeå (SE), St Anna Children's Hospital (AT), Örebro University Hospital (SE), Västerbotten County (SE), AZ Delta (BE), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Terumo (Germany) (DE), Umeå University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.