Patient perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in fertility treatment

The objective was to evaluate patient knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology within a fertility clinic. Patients were undergoing treatment between June 2024 and December 2024. The Main Outcome Measure(s) were Likert Comfort levels scale and Qualitative analysis of responses. Overall, 206 responses were received. While 41% believed that AI could improve outcomes, most (56%) indicated that they 'did not know'. Overall, respondents were comfortable with AI being used in administrative tasks (69%), assisting with clinical decisions (67%) and assisting an embryologist (74%). However, respondents were not comfortable with AI alone performing embryo selection (93.1%), conducting semen analysis (89.2%), sperm selection in ICSI (90.2%) or reporting an ultrasound scan (84.5%). Men were more likely to be comfortable with AI alone determining which embryo to transfer (<i>p</i> = 0.0037), conducting semen analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and sperm selection for ICSI (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Dominant themes regarding the benefits of AI included its use as an assistant, improving efficiency, and reducing error, while dominant themes of patient concerns included human replacement, loss of empathy, and the need for monitoring. Patients have concerns regarding the introduction of AI into fertility care, with men more likely than women to be comfortable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Fertility
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2591161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in fertility treatment

David A. Crosby, Renato Bauman, Niamh Fee, Louise Glover
1 citations
Human Fertility
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
1.88
article

Patient perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in fertility treatment

David A. Crosby, Renato Bauman, Niamh Fee, Louise Glover
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate patient knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology within a fertility clinic. Patients were undergoing treatment between June 2024 and December 2024. The Main Outcome Measure(s) were Likert Comfort levels scale and Qualitative analysis of responses. Overall, 206 responses were received. While 41% believed that AI could improve outcomes, most (56%) indicated that they 'did not know'. Overall, respondents were comfortable with AI being used in administrative tasks (69%), assisting with clinical decisions (67%) and assisting an embryologist (74%). However, respondents were not comfortable with AI alone performing embryo selection (93.1%), conducting semen analysis (89.2%), sperm selection in ICSI (90.2%) or reporting an ultrasound scan (84.5%). Men were more likely to be comfortable with AI alone determining which embryo to transfer (<i>p</i> = 0.0037), conducting semen analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.01), and sperm selection for ICSI (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Dominant themes regarding the benefits of AI included its use as an assistant, improving efficiency, and reducing error, while dominant themes of patient concerns included human replacement, loss of empathy, and the need for monitoring. Patients have concerns regarding the introduction of AI into fertility care, with men more likely than women to be comfortable.

Human FertilityVol. 28(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Merrion Fertility Clinic (IE), National Maternity Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.