Collateral Source Rule Approaches and Its Implications for Usual, Customary and Reasonable Pricing

The Collateral Source Rule is a legal doctrine that holds if an injured party receives some compensation for his injuries from a source wholly independent of the tortfeasor, such payment should not be deducted from the damages which the plaintiff would otherwise collect from the tortfeasor. This longstanding rule in civil procedure has been recently challenged in courts and state legislatures throughout the United States in the presentation of evidence regarding past and future medical expenses. As healthcare costing has become increasing complex, some courts have allowed evidence to be presented to the jury about reduction in plaintiff’s medical expenses based upon amounts paid by third party vendors. As such, life care planners have experienced the impact of the various approaches by state courts when presenting testimony about future medical expenses contained in the life care plan. This article discusses the current approaches by state courts in the United States and the implications collateral source rule approaches may have on the work of life care planners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Life Care Planning
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70385/001c.151639
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collateral Source Rule Approaches and Its Implications for Usual, Customary and Reasonable Pricing

Bruce L. Stern, Tony Owen
Journal of Life Care Planning
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Collateral Source Rule Approaches and Its Implications for Usual, Customary and Reasonable Pricing

Bruce L. Stern, Tony Owen
article en

Abstract

The Collateral Source Rule is a legal doctrine that holds if an injured party receives some compensation for his injuries from a source wholly independent of the tortfeasor, such payment should not be deducted from the damages which the plaintiff would otherwise collect from the tortfeasor. This longstanding rule in civil procedure has been recently challenged in courts and state legislatures throughout the United States in the presentation of evidence regarding past and future medical expenses. As healthcare costing has become increasing complex, some courts have allowed evidence to be presented to the jury about reduction in plaintiff’s medical expenses based upon amounts paid by third party vendors. As such, life care planners have experienced the impact of the various approaches by state courts when presenting testimony about future medical expenses contained in the life care plan. This article discusses the current approaches by state courts in the United States and the implications collateral source rule approaches may have on the work of life care planners.

Journal of Life Care PlanningVol. 20(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.