Strength analysis and structural optimization of UAV airframe

Introduction With the booming low-altitude economy, UAVs drive transformative changes across sectors, but their design must balance lightweight demands and structural integrity. This study conducts static analysis of a quadrotor under hovering, using two optimization methods to enhance performance. Methods Two strategies were adopted: mass-constrained structural optimization (maintaining original mass) and unconstrained stiffener optimization (maximizing stiffness/strength without mass limits). Results Mass-constrained optimization reduced max von Mises stress by 38.8% and displacement from 6.49 mm to 5.91 mm. Unconstrained stiffener optimization achieved 5.2% mass reduction, 60.9% stress reduction, and displacement down to 1.63 mm. Discussion Both methods maintain structural strength and boost payload capacity. The stiffener optimization (reinforced rib design) provides a practical solution for heavy-load quadrotor engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2025.1708043
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength analysis and structural optimization of UAV airframe

Zhichun Yang, Jiming Lv, L. Ye, Haifeng Zhang et al.
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Strength analysis and structural optimization of UAV airframe

Zhichun Yang, Jiming Lv, L. Ye, Haifeng Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yanpeng Zhao
article en

Abstract

Introduction With the booming low-altitude economy, UAVs drive transformative changes across sectors, but their design must balance lightweight demands and structural integrity. This study conducts static analysis of a quadrotor under hovering, using two optimization methods to enhance performance. Methods Two strategies were adopted: mass-constrained structural optimization (maintaining original mass) and unconstrained stiffener optimization (maximizing stiffness/strength without mass limits). Results Mass-constrained optimization reduced max von Mises stress by 38.8% and displacement from 6.49 mm to 5.91 mm. Unconstrained stiffener optimization achieved 5.2% mass reduction, 60.9% stress reduction, and displacement down to 1.63 mm. Discussion Both methods maintain structural strength and boost payload capacity. The stiffener optimization (reinforced rib design) provides a practical solution for heavy-load quadrotor engineering.

Frontiers in Mechanical EngineeringVol. 11
Anyang Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strength analysis and structural optimization of UAV airframe — Zhichun Yang, Jiming Lv, et al. · Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS