Stakeholders’ perceptions, acceptability, and sustainability of a larviciding intervention in Tanga Region, Tanzania

Background In 2019, the Government of Tanzania endorsed the countrywide implementation of mosquito larviciding to complement insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) as vector control interventions. Between 2022 and 2024, a large-scale pilot project covering a population of over 1 million individuals was implemented in the Tanga Region, in the northeast of the country. The program was implemented entirely by the government system and made use of community-owned resource persons (CORPs). This manuscript presents the key results of a qualitative study assessing the perceptions and awareness of the stakeholders and the acceptability, facilitating factors, barriers, and sustainability of the intervention. Companion publications report on the operations, entomological and epidemiological impacts, and costs of the program. Methodology This cross-sectional qualitative study used in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to assess perceptions, acceptability, and sustainability regarding larviciding. A total of 44 IDIs were conducted with government officials who oversaw project implementation. In addition, 13 FGDs were held with 156 community participants(72 CORPs involved in larviciding activities and 84 other community members). Data were analyzed using framework analysis. Results The study findings showed that community-based larviciding was perceived as safe, acceptable, effective, feasible, and sustainable. However, several key challenges were identified, including the unpleasant smell of the larvicide, the CORP turnover, logistic problems, and discontinuous implementation. Conclusion The pilot larviciding intervention implemented in the Tanga Region was perceived as safe, effective, feasible, and sustainable, and was widely accepted by the community. However, addressing key operational challenges such as the unpleasant odor of the larvicide, high CORP turnover, logistical constraints, and discontinuous implementation will be essential to ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of future large-scale rollouts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Malaria
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmala.2025.1693543
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders’ perceptions, acceptability, and sustainability of a larviciding intervention in Tanga Region, Tanzania

Prosper Chaki, Samwel Lazaro, Elizabeth Kasagama, Noela Kisoka et al.
Frontiers in Malaria
Malaria Research and Control
article

Stakeholders’ perceptions, acceptability, and sustainability of a larviciding intervention in Tanga Region, Tanzania

Prosper Chaki, Samwel Lazaro, Elizabeth Kasagama, Noela Kisoka, Jubilate Bernard, Charles Dismas Mwalimu, Leah Ndekuka, Fadhila Kihwele, Denis Kailembo, Angel Dillip, Tegemeo Gavana, Christian Lengeler, Stella Kajange, Best Yoram
article en

Abstract

Background In 2019, the Government of Tanzania endorsed the countrywide implementation of mosquito larviciding to complement insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) as vector control interventions. Between 2022 and 2024, a large-scale pilot project covering a population of over 1 million individuals was implemented in the Tanga Region, in the northeast of the country. The program was implemented entirely by the government system and made use of community-owned resource persons (CORPs). This manuscript presents the key results of a qualitative study assessing the perceptions and awareness of the stakeholders and the acceptability, facilitating factors, barriers, and sustainability of the intervention. Companion publications report on the operations, entomological and epidemiological impacts, and costs of the program. Methodology This cross-sectional qualitative study used in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to assess perceptions, acceptability, and sustainability regarding larviciding. A total of 44 IDIs were conducted with government officials who oversaw project implementation. In addition, 13 FGDs were held with 156 community participants(72 CORPs involved in larviciding activities and 84 other community members). Data were analyzed using framework analysis. Results The study findings showed that community-based larviciding was perceived as safe, acceptable, effective, feasible, and sustainable. However, several key challenges were identified, including the unpleasant smell of the larvicide, the CORP turnover, logistic problems, and discontinuous implementation. Conclusion The pilot larviciding intervention implemented in the Tanga Region was perceived as safe, effective, feasible, and sustainable, and was widely accepted by the community. However, addressing key operational challenges such as the unpleasant odor of the larvicide, high CORP turnover, logistical constraints, and discontinuous implementation will be essential to ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of future large-scale rollouts.

Frontiers in MalariaVol. 3
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (TZ), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Basel (CH), Ministry of Education and Vocation Training (TZ), Department of Biomedicine Basel (CH), Post Apotheke (DE), Ministry of Health (BB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.