Highly automated driving: the role of visuo-attentional and executive abilities in take-over success

Previous studies have sought to better understand exogenous factors explaining drivers' ability to regain control or not from highly automated driving. However, few studies have examined the role of individual factors in drivers' take-over behavior and performance. The present study sought to examine the extent to which take-over performance can be predicted by individual differences in visuo-attentional and executive abilities. After a period of automated driving on a simulator, participants aged 20 to 60 (<i>N</i> = 118) had to regain control of their vehicle in a critical take-over situation (i.e., avoiding an obstacle by changing lanes while other vehicles are approaching at higher speeds). The take-over manoeuvre was considered successful if the participants managed to complete it without colliding with the obstacle or another vehicle. All participants completed a battery of cognitive (working memory, inhibitory control, attentional flexibility, and planning) and visuo-attentional tests (visuomanual coordination, multiple object avoidance, and multiple object tracking), and reported their age and driving experience. Several partial least-squares models predicting the success of the manoeuvre from individual abilities were compared. The most accurate model had an accuracy of 70.79% and identified spatial working memory (measured with the CORSI task), visuomanual coordination (one's ability to manually track a moving target) and driving experience (annual mileage) as key factors for the success of the take-over. Conversely, higher inhibitory control ability, as measured by the Flanker and Stop-Signal tasks, was negatively related to take-over success, possibly because these participants exerted strong cognitive control over the non-driving task during automated driving, which came at the cost of flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1685223
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highly automated driving: the role of visuo-attentional and executive abilities in take-over success

Sami Mecheri, Camilo Charron, Damien Schnebelen, Franck Mars et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Highly automated driving: the role of visuo-attentional and executive abilities in take-over success

Sami Mecheri, Camilo Charron, Damien Schnebelen, Franck Mars, Régis Lobjois
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have sought to better understand exogenous factors explaining drivers' ability to regain control or not from highly automated driving. However, few studies have examined the role of individual factors in drivers' take-over behavior and performance. The present study sought to examine the extent to which take-over performance can be predicted by individual differences in visuo-attentional and executive abilities. After a period of automated driving on a simulator, participants aged 20 to 60 (<i>N</i> = 118) had to regain control of their vehicle in a critical take-over situation (i.e., avoiding an obstacle by changing lanes while other vehicles are approaching at higher speeds). The take-over manoeuvre was considered successful if the participants managed to complete it without colliding with the obstacle or another vehicle. All participants completed a battery of cognitive (working memory, inhibitory control, attentional flexibility, and planning) and visuo-attentional tests (visuomanual coordination, multiple object avoidance, and multiple object tracking), and reported their age and driving experience. Several partial least-squares models predicting the success of the manoeuvre from individual abilities were compared. The most accurate model had an accuracy of 70.79% and identified spatial working memory (measured with the CORSI task), visuomanual coordination (one's ability to manually track a moving target) and driving experience (annual mileage) as key factors for the success of the take-over. Conversely, higher inhibitory control ability, as measured by the Flanker and Stop-Signal tasks, was negatively related to take-over success, possibly because these participants exerted strong cognitive control over the non-driving task during automated driving, which came at the cost of flexibility.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
École Centrale de Nantes (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Rennes 2 (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (FR), Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives (FR), Institut de Médecine Tropicale du Service de Santé des Armées (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Université de Rennes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.