Passive acoustic monitoring with AI‐based detection and identification reveal sooty grouse hooting patterns in western Oregon

Many bird species are monitored using auditory point count surveys during the breeding season. Autonomous recording units (ARUs) can be used to better understand the daily and seasonal timing of when a species is vocalizing, which can help align surveys with the time period when the maximum number of individuals are present. We used ARUs to improve our understanding of sooty grouse Dendragapus fuliginosus hooting frequency to align our current point count hooting surveys with the dates of peak hooting. From 2020–2023, we deployed ARUs at 121 locations in western Oregon, USA near known hooting males. We evaluated the performance of PNW‐Cnet, an AI‐based detection application, for identifying the hooting song, the main breeding vocalization of male sooty grouse. Precision (true positives/apparent detections made by PNW‐Cnet) was > 0.999, indicating the model was highly effective at avoiding false positive detections of hooting. Recall (true positives/true positives + false negatives) was 0.595, suggesting that while the model reliably identified hooting when detected, it missed a substantial portion of hooting events. We then used generalized additive models with random effects to examine breeding season patterns in hooting frequency relative to date, time, weather, elevation, and latitude. Expected hooting frequency peaked in late‐April, providing guidance on the optimal timing of point count surveys. Daily patterns revealed a rapid increase in hooting 30 min before sunrise, then leveling at a relatively constant hooting frequency up to at least six hours after sunrise (latest recording time). Our results suggest males continue to vocalize throughout the entire morning allowing surveys to be conducted beyond three hours after sunrise. Hooting frequency decreased with increased precipitation and at high temperatures, whereas elevation and latitude effects varied. ARUs provided detailed hooting data that will enhance future surveys and improve population monitoring efficiency of sooty grouse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2025-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01541
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive acoustic monitoring with AI‐based detection and identification reveal sooty grouse hooting patterns in western Oregon

M. L. Cline, Jonathan B. Dinkins, K. C. Walton, C. Christensen et al.
Wildlife Biology
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Passive acoustic monitoring with AI‐based detection and identification reveal sooty grouse hooting patterns in western Oregon

M. L. Cline, Jonathan B. Dinkins, K. C. Walton, C. Christensen, Sarah J. K. Frey, L. E. Gramberg
article en

Abstract

Many bird species are monitored using auditory point count surveys during the breeding season. Autonomous recording units (ARUs) can be used to better understand the daily and seasonal timing of when a species is vocalizing, which can help align surveys with the time period when the maximum number of individuals are present. We used ARUs to improve our understanding of sooty grouse Dendragapus fuliginosus hooting frequency to align our current point count hooting surveys with the dates of peak hooting. From 2020–2023, we deployed ARUs at 121 locations in western Oregon, USA near known hooting males. We evaluated the performance of PNW‐Cnet, an AI‐based detection application, for identifying the hooting song, the main breeding vocalization of male sooty grouse. Precision (true positives/apparent detections made by PNW‐Cnet) was > 0.999, indicating the model was highly effective at avoiding false positive detections of hooting. Recall (true positives/true positives + false negatives) was 0.595, suggesting that while the model reliably identified hooting when detected, it missed a substantial portion of hooting events. We then used generalized additive models with random effects to examine breeding season patterns in hooting frequency relative to date, time, weather, elevation, and latitude. Expected hooting frequency peaked in late‐April, providing guidance on the optimal timing of point count surveys. Daily patterns revealed a rapid increase in hooting 30 min before sunrise, then leveling at a relatively constant hooting frequency up to at least six hours after sunrise (latest recording time). Our results suggest males continue to vocalize throughout the entire morning allowing surveys to be conducted beyond three hours after sunrise. Hooting frequency decreased with increased precipitation and at high temperatures, whereas elevation and latitude effects varied. ARUs provided detailed hooting data that will enhance future surveys and improve population monitoring efficiency of sooty grouse.

Wildlife Biology
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oregon State University, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.