Experimental study on mechanical and fracture characteristics of rock–concrete interface under dynamic direct tension

Abstract Rock–concrete interface is common in rock engineering, such as shotcreting in underground cavern, socketed pile, bridge anchorage etc. These rock–concrete interfaces are often subjected to dynamic tension, which can be induced by the compressive wave reflected by the free surface, and results in interfacial spalling even the collapse of rock–concrete structure. However, the dynamic tensile behavior of the rock–concrete interface under different loading directions, particularly the failure mechanism, is still unclear. This study employs split Hopkinson tension bar testing on rock–concrete specimens to investigate the influence of rock type, loading rate and direction on these tensile behaviors. Results show that rock–concrete interfaces exhibit distinct tensile behaviors depending on the rock type, primarily influenced by the interfacial tensile force. With increasing loading rate, both the dynamic tensile strength and average dynamic modulus of the granite–concrete interface increase, while the dynamic peak strain shows a decreasing trend. Loading direction has a significant effect on dynamic tensile behaviors of granite–concrete specimens. The dynamic tensile strength increases with the loading direction angle, and the failure mode changes accordingly from interfacial tensile failure to mixed tensile failure. Macro and micro morphologies indicate that the effect of loading direction and loading rate is attributed to the interfacial contact area and unit interfacial tensile strength, respectively. The findings can contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamic tensile behavior of rock–concrete structures under different loading directions and can be applied to the design and reinforcement of practical engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-01072-9
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study on mechanical and fracture characteristics of rock–concrete interface under dynamic direct tension

Honglue Qu, Rui Li, Heping Xie, Dongya Han et al.
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Experimental study on mechanical and fracture characteristics of rock–concrete interface under dynamic direct tension

Honglue Qu, Rui Li, Heping Xie, Dongya Han, Weiyue Bao, Jianbo Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rock–concrete interface is common in rock engineering, such as shotcreting in underground cavern, socketed pile, bridge anchorage etc. These rock–concrete interfaces are often subjected to dynamic tension, which can be induced by the compressive wave reflected by the free surface, and results in interfacial spalling even the collapse of rock–concrete structure. However, the dynamic tensile behavior of the rock–concrete interface under different loading directions, particularly the failure mechanism, is still unclear. This study employs split Hopkinson tension bar testing on rock–concrete specimens to investigate the influence of rock type, loading rate and direction on these tensile behaviors. Results show that rock–concrete interfaces exhibit distinct tensile behaviors depending on the rock type, primarily influenced by the interfacial tensile force. With increasing loading rate, both the dynamic tensile strength and average dynamic modulus of the granite–concrete interface increase, while the dynamic peak strain shows a decreasing trend. Loading direction has a significant effect on dynamic tensile behaviors of granite–concrete specimens. The dynamic tensile strength increases with the loading direction angle, and the failure mode changes accordingly from interfacial tensile failure to mixed tensile failure. Macro and micro morphologies indicate that the effect of loading direction and loading rate is attributed to the interfacial contact area and unit interfacial tensile strength, respectively. The findings can contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamic tensile behavior of rock–concrete structures under different loading directions and can be applied to the design and reinforcement of practical engineering.

Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-ResourcesVol. 12(1)
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN), Central South University (CN), Southwest Petroleum University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.