Wide diversity in narrow geographic space: genetic, morphological and ploidy variation in three Central European <i>Crataegus</i> species with emphasis on their reproductive modes

Hybridization, polyploidization, and apomixis are evolutionary forces that obscure genetic differentiation and boost morphological variability. These processes have shaped the family Rosaceae, particularly the genus <i>Crataegus</i>, which includes both diploid and polyploid species reproducing sexually or via apomixis. In Central Europe, <i>C. monogyna</i> and <i>C. laevigata</i> are predominantly diploid sexuals, while <i>C. rhipidophylla</i> is mainly a polyploid apomict. These species hybridize to form <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>media</i>, <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>macrocarpa</i>, and <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>subsphaerica</i>. Our aim was to assess how hybridization, apomixis, and polyploidy shape <i>Crataegus</i> diversity by integrating genetic, morphological, and cytological data. Leaves and fruits were collected from ten natural populations where all three species coexist and hybridize. Species identification was performed with novel nuclear microsatellites, marking the first genetic-based <i>Crataegus</i> taxonomy in Central Europe. Ploidy levels were estimated by flow cytometry (FCM), including seed screening to infer reproductive modes. A combined morphological analysis of leaves and fruits was used to distinguish parental species and evaluate hybrid variability. Genotyping identified distinct genetic clusters for parental species and their hybrids, with geographic structuring within <i>C. laevigata</i> and <i>C. rhipidophylla</i>. Morphological data clearly separated genetically defined parental species, although hybrids can be difficult to distinguish from parents due to a big overlap in morphology. FCM indicated that <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>media</i> is predominantly a diploid sexual hybrid like its diploid parents, while other tri- or tetraploid hybrids with polyploid <i>C. rhipidophylla</i> as a parent are apomictic. Ploidy rather than hybridization dictates the mode of reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AoB Plants
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plaf067
Primary Topic
Botanical Studies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wide diversity in narrow geographic space: genetic, morphological and ploidy variation in three Central European Crataegus species with emphasis on their reproductive modes

Marcela van Loo, Roman Ufimov, Roswitha Schmickl, L. Lee et al.
AoB Plants
Botanical Studies and Applications
article

Wide diversity in narrow geographic space: genetic, morphological and ploidy variation in three Central European Crataegus species with emphasis on their reproductive modes

Marcela van Loo, Roman Ufimov, Roswitha Schmickl, L. Lee, Soňa Píšová, Tomáš Fér, M. Breuer, Paula Irusta, Anna Zöchner, Saranchimeg Jargal, Eliah Milan Grooß
article en

Abstract

Hybridization, polyploidization, and apomixis are evolutionary forces that obscure genetic differentiation and boost morphological variability. These processes have shaped the family Rosaceae, particularly the genus <i>Crataegus</i>, which includes both diploid and polyploid species reproducing sexually or via apomixis. In Central Europe, <i>C. monogyna</i> and <i>C. laevigata</i> are predominantly diploid sexuals, while <i>C. rhipidophylla</i> is mainly a polyploid apomict. These species hybridize to form <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>media</i>, <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>macrocarpa</i>, and <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>subsphaerica</i>. Our aim was to assess how hybridization, apomixis, and polyploidy shape <i>Crataegus</i> diversity by integrating genetic, morphological, and cytological data. Leaves and fruits were collected from ten natural populations where all three species coexist and hybridize. Species identification was performed with novel nuclear microsatellites, marking the first genetic-based <i>Crataegus</i> taxonomy in Central Europe. Ploidy levels were estimated by flow cytometry (FCM), including seed screening to infer reproductive modes. A combined morphological analysis of leaves and fruits was used to distinguish parental species and evaluate hybrid variability. Genotyping identified distinct genetic clusters for parental species and their hybrids, with geographic structuring within <i>C. laevigata</i> and <i>C. rhipidophylla</i>. Morphological data clearly separated genetically defined parental species, although hybrids can be difficult to distinguish from parents due to a big overlap in morphology. FCM indicated that <i>C.</i> <i>×</i> <i>media</i> is predominantly a diploid sexual hybrid like its diploid parents, while other tri- or tetraploid hybrids with polyploid <i>C. rhipidophylla</i> as a parent are apomictic. Ploidy rather than hybridization dictates the mode of reproduction.

AoB PlantsVol. 18(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), Charles University (CZ), Petra University (JO), Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Clínica Diagonal (ES), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), Department of Conservation (NZ), Austrian Research Centre for Forests (AT), Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Life University (US), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), University of Göttingen (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Leipzig University (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká Fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Akademie Věd České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Botanical Studies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.