A critical analysis of the methodological limitations in trials of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction

The methodology applied to the published LiSWT studies is remarkably heterogeneous, with a 30-fold difference in shock number and a 5-fold difference in weekly session number and number of application sites. These data emphasize the current inability to compare results across studies using nine different devices and disparate treatment protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual Medicine Reviews
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf065
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical analysis of the methodological limitations in trials of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction

Carolyn A. Salter, Hisanori Taniguchi, Daniel Kim, John P. Mulhall
Sexual Medicine Reviews
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

A critical analysis of the methodological limitations in trials of low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction

Carolyn A. Salter, Hisanori Taniguchi, Daniel Kim, John P. Mulhall
article en

Abstract

The methodology applied to the published LiSWT studies is remarkably heterogeneous, with a 30-fold difference in shock number and a 5-fold difference in weekly session number and number of application sites. These data emphasize the current inability to compare results across studies using nine different devices and disparate treatment protocols.

Sexual Medicine ReviewsVol. 14(1)
Kansai Medical University (JP), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.